Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25529632›Full record

ReviewBrain research2015

Differential roles of medial prefrontal subregions in the regulation of drug seeking.

David E Moorman, Morgan H James, Ellen M McGlinchey, Gary Aston-Jones

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 149 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
149citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

149 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Inactivation of NMDAR and CaMKII signaling within the prelimbic cortex blocks incubated cocaine- and sucrose-craving.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Sex-specific role of the 5-HTNature communications · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Distinct prelimbic cortex ensembles encode response execution and inhibition.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

89 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David E MoormanDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences & Neuroscience and Behavior Graduate Program, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA 01003, United States. Electronic address: moorman@cns.umass.edu.
Morgan H JamesBrain Health Institute, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, United States.
Ellen M McGlincheyBrain Health Institute, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, United States; Program in Neurosciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, United States.
Gary Aston-JonesBrain Health Institute, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854, United States.

Funding

ROLE OF OREXIN IN COCAINE DEMAND AND ADDICTIONR01DA006214 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI ASTON-JONES, GARY S. · 1989 to 2024
$6.0M
Role of Prefrontal Networks in Addiction EndophenotypesR21DA032005 · NIDA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI MOORMAN, DAVID E · 2011 to 2012
$356k
The Role of the Hippocampal-Lateral Septum Circuit in Cocaine AbuseF31DA035561 · NIDA · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI MCGLINCHEY, ELLEN MORGAN · 2014 to 2016
$88k
NIDA NIH HHS F31 DA035561NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA006214NIDA NIH HHS R21 DA032005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The prefrontal cortex plays an important role in shaping cognition and behavior. Many studies have shown that medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) plays a key role in seeking, extinction, and reinstatement of cocaine seeking in rodent models of relapse. Subregions of mPFC appear to play distinct roles in these behaviors, such that the prelimbic cortex (PL) is proposed to drive cocaine seeking and the infralimbic cortex (IL) is proposed to suppress cocaine seeking after extinction. This dichotomy of mPFC function may be a general attribute, as similar dorsal-ventral distinctions exist for expression vs. extinction of fear conditioning. However, other results indicate that the role of mPFC neurons in reward processing is more complex than a simple PL-seek vs. IL-extinguish dichotomy. Both PL and IL have been shown to drive and inhibit drug seeking (and other types of behaviors) depending on a range of factors including the behavioral context, the drug-history of the animal, and the type of drug investigated. This heterogeneity of findings may reflect multiple subcircuits within each of these PFC areas supporting unique functions. It may also reflect the fact that the mPFC plays a multifaceted role in shaping cognition and behavior, including those overlapping with cocaine seeking and extinction. Here we discuss research leading to the hypothesis that dorsal and ventral mPFC differentially control drug seeking and extinction. We also present recent results calling the absolute nature of a PL vs. IL dichotomy into question. Finally, we consider alternate functions for mPFC that correspond less to response execution and inhibition and instead incorporate the complex cognitive behavior for which the mPFC is broadly appreciated.

Indexed as

AnimalsDrug-Seeking BehaviorHumansPrefrontal CortexSubstance-Related DisordersAddictionCocaineCognitionCortexDrugsFrontalInfralimbicNetworksPrefrontalPrelimbic

Identifiers

PMID25529632
PMCPMC4472631

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.