Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25529225›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2015

Drug-drug interaction software in clinical practice: a systematic review.

Tina Roblek, Tomaz Vaupotic, Ales Mrhar, Mitja Lainscak

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Effect of electronic drug-drug interaction alerts on patient and clinician outcomes: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Prevalence of drug interactions in hospitalised elderly patients: a systematic review.European journal of hospital pharmacy : science and practice · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. DDI-CYP: Metabolism ensemble models for drug-drug interaction predictions.Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tina RoblekFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Tomaz Vaupotic
Ales Mrhar
Mitja Lainscak

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSeveral electronic databases which report the prevalence of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are used as a tool for evaluation of potentially harmful DDIs. The aim of our review was to evaluate the usability and appropriateness of commercially available electronic databases which assess the prevalence of potential DDIs.

methodsThe systematic electronic literature search was conducted with the following search terms: "database" AND "software," and "drug-drug interactions" AND "database," and the inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied in order to identify the publications of interest.

resultsA total of 3766 papers were identified by systematic search. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 38 publications were included in the analysis. The most commonly used software in the included studies was Micromedex® Drug-Reax, for which some authors argue to be the most reliable due to highest sensitivity. It gives information about clinical consequences of DDIs, classifies underlying mechanism and onset of the adverse outcome (either rapid, or delayed) as well as severity (such as minor, moderate, or major), and provides the level of evidence which supports this information. This data is also provided by Drug Interaction Facts®, Lexi-Interact®, and Pharmavista®. A small number of studies which compared assessment of DDIs with electronic database and the clinician's assessment showed large discrepancy in number and relevance of detected DDIs. The overlap was in some cases as low as 11 %.

conclusionThe deficiency of clinical relevance of detected DDIs should be addressed in the upcoming research as it would provide more relevant information to the prescribers' in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Drug InteractionsSoftwareDatabases, PharmaceuticalHumans

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.