Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25529015›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2014

Recurrence pattern analysis after re-irradiation with bevacizumab in recurrent malignant glioma patients.

Maximilian Niyazi, Nathalie Lisa Jansen, Maya Rottler, Ute Ganswindt, Claus Belka

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. DynamicCancers · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Journal of neuro-oncology · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Maximilian NiyaziDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. maximilian.niyazi@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Nathalie Lisa JansenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, University of Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. Nathalie.Jansen@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Maya RottlerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. Maya.Rottler@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Ute GanswindtDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. Ute.Ganswindt@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Claus BelkaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. Claus.Belka@med.uni-muenchen.de.
München Klinik · DELMU Klinikum · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of the present analysis was to evaluate the recurrence pattern in patients with recurrent malignant glioma after re-irradiation in combination with bevacizumab as there is limited data on how to optimally choose dose, fractionation and delineation margins.

methodsThirty-one patients with recurrent malignant glioma treated with re-irradiation and bevacizumab after previous chemoradiotherapy (concurrent temozolomide 75 mg/m(2)/d according to the EORTC/NCIC trial) and [(18) F]FET-PET and/or MRI confirmed recurrence were retrospectively analyzed. Bevacizumab was applied twice during fractionated re-irradiation (10 mg/kg, d1+d15, median 36 Gy, conventionally fractionated). Recurrence patterns were assessed by means of [(18) F]FET-PET and/or MRI.

resultsMedian follow-up was 34.0 months for all patients [95%-CI, 27.7-40.3] and median post-recurrence survival 10.8 months [95%-CI, 9.2-12.4]. Concerning the recurrence patterns, 61.3% of these were located in-field (19 patients), 22.6% were marginal (7 patients) and 16.1% ex-field (5 patients). No influence on the recurrence pattern was observed according to sex, WHO grade, maintenance chemotherapy or MGMT methylation status whereas planning target volume (PTV) size had a significant influence on the recurrence pattern (p=0.032). PTV sizes>75 ml were associated with a higher in-field recurrence rate and lower median post-recurrence progression-free survival (8.5 vs. 4.9 months, p=0.016).

conclusionsAfter the administration of re-irradiation with bevacizumab the recurrence pattern seems to be mainly centrally located. The PTV size was the main predictor for a marginal/ex-field recurrence.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsBevacizumabBrain NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyDisease-Free SurvivalDose Fractionation, RadiationFemaleGliomaHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMultimodal ImagingAntineoplastic AgentsBevacizumab

Identifiers

PMID25529015
PMCPMC4307885
OpenAlexW2129874219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.