Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25528993›Full record

Trial reportPsycho-oncology2015

Optimism and barriers to colonoscopy in low-income Latinos at average risk for colorectal cancer.

Elizaveta Efuni, Katherine N DuHamel, Gary Winkel, Tatiana Starr, Lina Jandorf

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psycho-oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 45% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Colorectal cancer screening in Uruguay: current assessment and roadmap for the future.Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elizaveta EfuniDepartment of Oncological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1428 Madison Avenue, New York, NY, USA.
Katherine N DuHamelDepartment of Oncological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1428 Madison Avenue, New York, NY, USA.
Gary WinkelDepartment of Oncological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1428 Madison Avenue, New York, NY, USA.
Tatiana StarrDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 641 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY, USA.
Lina JandorfDepartment of Oncological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1428 Madison Avenue, New York, NY, USA.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Improving CRC Screening for Diverse Hispanics in an Urban Primary Care SettingR01CA140737 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI DUHAMEL, KATHERINE N · 2011 to 2014
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA140737
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesColorectal cancer (CRC) screening continues to be underused, particularly by Latinos. CRC and colonoscopy fear, worry, and fatalism have been identified as screening barriers in Latinos. The study purpose was to examine the relationship of optimism, fatalism, worry, and fear in the context of Latinos referred for CRC screening.

methodsOur sample included 251 Latinos between the ages of 50 and 83 years who had no personal or immediate family history of CRC, no personal history of gastrointestinal disorder, no colonoscopy in the past 5 years, and received a referral for a colonoscopy. Face-to-face interviews were performed, and data were analyzed using regression models.

resultsGreater optimism (β = -1.72, p < 0.000), lower fatalism (β = 0.29, p < 0.01), and absence of family history of cancer (β = 1, p < 0.01) were associated with decreased worry about the colonoscopy. Being female (β = 0.85, p < 0.05) and born in the USA (β = 1.1, p < 0.01) were associated with greater worry about colonoscopy and the possibility of having CRC. Family history of cancer (β = 2.6, p < 0.01), female gender (β = 2.9, p < 0.000), not following the doctor's advice (β = 2.7, p < 0.01), and putting off medical problems (β = 1.9, p < 0.05) were associated with greater fear. In the multiple regression model, lower optimism (β = -0.09, p < 0.05), higher fatalism (β = 0.28, p < 0.01), and female gender (β = 0.9, p < 0.05) were associated with greater worry.

conclusionsInterventions that address fatalism and promote optimistic beliefs may reduce worry among Latinos referred for colonoscopy. Interventions that alleviate colonoscopy fear because of family history of cancer particularly among Latino women may help improve distress about CRC screening.

Indexed as

OptimismAgedAged, 80 and overAnxietyAttitude to HealthColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesFearFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansMaleMiddle AgedPovertyRisk Assessmentcancercolonoscopyfearoncologyoptimism

Identifiers

PMID25528993
PMCPMC4474785
OpenAlexW2101068734

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.