Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25528665›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2014

Cross-sectional study of Schmallenberg virus seroprevalence in wild ruminants in Poland at the end of the vector season of 2013.

Magdalena Larska, Michał K Krzysiak, Julia Kęsik-Maliszewska, Jerzy Rola

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Were Polish Wild Boars Exposed to Schmallenberg Virus?Journal of veterinary research · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Magdalena LarskaDepartment of Virology, National Veterinary Research Institute, Al. Partyzantów 57, 24-100, Puławy, Poland. m.larska@piwet.pulawy.pl.
Michał K KrzysiakEuropean Bison Breeding Center, Bialowieża National Park, Park Pałacowy 11, 17-230, Białowieża, Poland. vet@bpn.com.pl.
Julia Kęsik-MaliszewskaDepartment of Virology, National Veterinary Research Institute, Al. Partyzantów 57, 24-100, Puławy, Poland. julia.kesik@piwet.pulawy.pl.
Jerzy RolaDepartment of Virology, National Veterinary Research Institute, Al. Partyzantów 57, 24-100, Puławy, Poland. jrola@piwet.pulawy.pl.
National Veterinary Research Institute · PLBiałowieża National Park · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn view of recurrent Schmallenberg virus (SBV) infections all over Europe between 2011 and 2013, a lively scientific debate over the importance of the sylvatic transmission cycle of the virus has emerged. The study presents results of serosurvey which included wild ruminants representing species of red deer (Cervus elaphus), roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), European bison (Bison bonasus), fallow deer (Dama dama), mouflon (Ovis orientalis musimon) hunted or immobilized at 34 different locations of Poland in the autumn/winter 2013.

resultsOut of 580 sera, 145 (25%) were considered positive for SBV antibodies. The overall SBV seroprevalence calculated using district probability weights was estimated at 27.7% (95% CI: 24.0-31.4). The seroprevalences at the district level varied between 0 and 80.0% (95% CI: 24.5-135.0%) with the mean within-district prevalence of 24.0% (95% CI: 16.5-31.4). Significantly higher seroprevalence was observed in animals from the Eastern provinces (36.6%) compared to the Western provinces (22.8%). SBV infection impact varied significantly between different species (higher SBV seroprevalence in larger species such as European bison), population type (free-ranging; captive), age, body weight, percent of the district forest area, part of Poland, and the densities of wild and domestic ruminants at the district and province level. Using statistical multivariable logistic model, population type, age, part of Poland and domestic ruminant density were identified as the main risk factors for SBV infection in wild ruminants in Poland.

conclusionsSBV seroprevalence in wild ruminants, similarly to the epizootic situation in domestic ruminants in the country, varied significantly between districts and provinces. Association between SBV seropositivity, species, animal body weight and age group expressed by a higher prevalence in larger ruminants may be explained by more frequent exposure to midge-vector bites of the latter, however it might also be related to the different species susceptibility to SBV infection. The positive effect of higher domestic ruminant density on the risk of SBV infection in wildlife and lower SBV seroprevalences in the latter suggested that the sylvatic cycle of SBV transmission is an effect of the pathogen spillover from the domestic animals.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, WildBisonBunyaviridae InfectionsCross-Sectional StudiesDeerEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleMaleNeutralization TestsOrthobunyavirusPolandRuminantsSeasonsSeroepidemiologic StudiesSheep

Identifiers

PMID25528665
PMCPMC4299547
OpenAlexW2161509898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.