ArticleBMC medical education2014
Doctors' views about training and future careers expressed one year after graduation by UK-trained doctors: questionnaire surveys undertaken in 2009 and 2010.
Article in BMC medical education, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Training experience across UK medicine: deanery differences versus site variation-General Medical Council National Training Survey 2025 analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Combined empowerment, continuous appraisal, psychological and career counseling improve medical cadets' satisfaction and may potentially offset burnout during internship year. An 18-months successful experience in a tertiary medical center.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Want doctors to use VR simulation? Make it mandatory, accessible, educationally valuable, and enjoyable!MedEdPublish (2016) · 2024Article
- Conceptualizing "Preparedness for Practice": Perspectives of Early-Career Family Physicians.Family medicine · 2023Article
- Article
- Symptoms of and coping strategies for music performance anxiety through different time periods.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Clinical scientists' early career choices and progression: an exploratory mixed methods study.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Why are UK junior doctors taking time out of training and what are their experiences? A qualitative study.Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2019Article
- Social and professional influences on antimicrobial prescribing for doctors-in-training: a realist review.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2017Review
- Perception of Preparedness for Clinical Work Among New Residents: A Cross-sectional Study from Oman.Oman medical journal · 2017Article
- Exposure of undergraduates to authentic GP teaching and subsequent entry to GP training: a quantitative study of UK medical schools.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017Article
- Doctors' views about their work, education and training three years after graduation in the UK: questionnaire survey.JRSM open · 2015Article
- Perceptions of the preparedness of medical graduates for internship responsibilities in district hospitals in Kenya: a qualitative study.BMC medical education · 2015Article
- Why does moral reasoning not improve in medical students?International journal of medical education · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe UK medical graduates of 2008 and 2009 were among the first to experience a fully implemented, new, UK training programme, called the Foundation Training Programme, for junior doctors. We report doctors' views of the first Foundation year, based on comments made as part of a questionnaire survey covering career choices, plans, and experiences.
methodsPostal and email based questionnaires about career intentions, destinations and views were sent in 2009 and 2010 to all UK medical graduates of 2008 and 2009. This paper is a qualitative study of 'free-text' comments made by first-year doctors when invited to comment, if they wished, on any aspect of their work, education, training, and future.
resultsThe response rate to the surveys was 48% (6220/12952); and 1616 doctors volunteered comments. Of these, 61% wrote about their first year of training, 35% about the working conditions they had experienced, 33% about how well their medical school had prepared them for work, 29% about their future career, 25% about support from peers and colleagues, 22% about working in medicine, and 15% about lifestyle issues. When concerns were expressed, they were commonly about the balance between service provision, administrative work, and training and education, with the latter often suffering when it conflicted with the needs of medical service provision. They also wrote that the quality of a training post often depended on the commitment of an individual senior doctor. Service support from seniors was variable and some respondents complained of a lack of team work and team ethic. Excessive hours and the lack of time for reflection and career planning before choices about the future had to be made were also mentioned. Some doctors wrote that their views were not sought by their hospital and that NHS management structures did not lend themselves to efficiency. UK graduates from non-UK homes felt insecure about their future career prospects in the UK. There were positive comments about opportunities to train flexibly.
conclusionsAlthough reported problems should be considered in the wider context, in which the majority held favourable overall views, many who commented had been disappointed by aspects of their first year of work. We hope that the concerns raised by our respondents will prompt trainers, locally, to determine, by interaction with junior staff, whether or not these are concerns in their own training programme.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.