Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25528166›Full record

Trial reportBMC neurology2014

Early supported discharge after stroke in Bergen (ESD Stroke Bergen): three and six months results of a randomised controlled trial comparing two early supported discharge schemes with treatment as usual.

Håkon Hofstad, Bente Elisabeth Bassøe Gjelsvik, Halvor Næss, Geir Egil Eide, Jan Sture Skouen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC neurology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00771771 (Early Supported Discharge After Stroke in Bergen. An RCT Looking at the Collaboration Between Hospital Service and Primary Health Care.), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00771771 nacompletednot on this map

Early Supported Discharge After Stroke in Bergen. An RCT Looking at the Collaboration Between Hospital Service and Primary Health Care.

TypeinterventionalSponsorHaukeland University HospitalRan2008 to 2013Enrolled306ConditionsStrokeArmsEarly supported discharge with day unit rehabilitation, Early supported discharge with home rehabilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Early supported discharge services for people with acute stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  5. Early discharge hospital at home.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Håkon Hofstad
Bente Elisabeth Bassøe Gjelsvik
Halvor Næss
Geir Egil Eide
Jan Sture Skouen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStroke causes lasting disability and the burden of stroke is expected to increase substantially during the next decades. Optimal rehabilitation is therefore mandatory. Early supported discharge (ESD) has previously shown beneficial, but all major studies were carried out more than ten years ago. We wanted to implement and study the results of ESD in our community today with comparisons between ESD and treatment as usual, as well as between two different ESD models.

methodsPatients with acute stroke were included during a three year period (2008-11) in a randomised controlled study comparing two different ESD models to treatment as usual. The two ESD models differed by the location of treatment: either in a day unit or in the patients' homes. Patients in the ESD groups were followed by a multi-disciplinary ambulatory team in the stroke unit and discharged home as early as possible. The ESD models also comprised treatment by a multi-disciplinary community health team for up to five weeks and follow-up controls after 3 and 6 months. Primary outcome was modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at six months.

resultsThree-hundred-and-six patients were included. mRS scores and change scores were non-significantly better in the two ESD groups at 3 and 6 months. Within-group improvement from baseline to 3 months was significant in the ESD 1 (p = 0.042) and ESD 2 (p = 0.001) groups, but not in the controls. More patients in the pooled ESD groups were independent at 3 (p = 0.086) and 6 months (p = 0.122) compared to controls and there also was a significant difference in 3 month change score between them (p = 0.049). There were no differences between the two ESD groups. Length of stay in the stroke unit was 11 days in all groups.

conclusionsPatients in the ESD groups tended to be more independent than controls at 3 and 6 months, but no clear statistically significant differences were found. The added effect of supported discharge and improved follow-up seems to be rather modest. The improved stroke treatment of today may necessitate larger patient samples to demonstrate additional benefit of ESD. CLINICAL

trial registrationUnique identifier: NCT00771771.

Indexed as

Length of StayPatient DischargeStroke RehabilitationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID25528166
PMCPMC4301654

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.