ArticlePlanta2015
Two Blast-independent tools, CyPerl and CyExcel, for harvesting hundreds of novel cyclotides and analogues from plant genomes and protein databases.
Article in Planta, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent advances in structural and functional diversities of cancer lncRNA-encoded peptides: current opportunities and challenges for enhancing cancer diagnosis and treatment.Cancer cell international · 2026Review
- LC-MS/MS identification and structural characterization of isolated cyclotides from precursor sequences ofJournal of biosciences · 2022Article
- Review
- Cyclotides: Overview and Biotechnological Applications.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2017Review
- Cyclotide Evolution: Insights from the Analyses of Their Precursor Sequences, Structures and Distribution in Violets (Frontiers in plant science · 2017Article
- Chemical and biological production of cyclotides.Advances in botanical researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
MAIN
conclusionTwo high-throughput tools harvest hundreds of novel cyclotides and analogues in plants. Cyclotides are gene-encoded backbone-cyclized polypeptides displaying a diverse range of bioactivities associated with plant defense. However, genome-scale or database-scale evaluations of cyclotides have been rare so far. Here, a novel time-efficient Perl program, CyPerl, was developed for searching cyclotides from predicted ORFs of 34 available plant genomes and existing plant protein sequences from Genbank databases. CyPerl-isolated sequences were further analyzed by removing repeats, evaluating their cysteine-distributed regions (CDRs) and comparing with CyBase-collected cyclotides in a user-friendly Excel (Microsoft Office) template, CyExcel. After genome-screening, 186 ORFs containing 145 unique cyclotide analogues were identified by CyPerl and CyExcel from 30 plant genomes tested from 10 plant families. Phaseolus vulgaris and Zea mays were the richest two species containing cyclotide analogues in the plants tested. After screening protein databases, 266 unique cyclotides and analogues were identified from seven plant families. By merging with 288 unique CyBase-listed cyclotides, 510 unique cyclotides and analogues were obtained from 13 plant families. In total, seven novel plant families containing cyclotide analogues and 202 novel cyclotide analogues were identified in this study. This study has established two Blast-independent tools for screening cyclotides from plant genomes and protein databases, and has also significantly widened the plant distribution and sequence diversity of cyclotides and their analogues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
25528148What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.