ArticleJournal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition2015
Test-enhanced learning versus errorless learning in aphasia rehabilitation: testing competing psychological principles.
Article in Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Errorless and errorful learning in people with aphasia across novel-object pairing and word retrieval tasks.Aphasiology · 2024Article
- An electrophysiological and behavioral investigation of feedback-based learning in aphasia.Aphasiology · 2024Article
- Errorless, Errorful, and Retrieval Practice for Naming Treatment in Aphasia: A Scoping Review of Learning Mechanisms and Treatment Ingredients.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2023Article
- An examination of retrieval practice and production training in the treatment of lexical-semantic comprehension deficits in aphasia.Neuropsychology · 2022Article
- Article
- Similarities between Cognitive Models of Language Production and Everyday Functioning: Implications for Development of Interventions for Functional Difficulties.Topics in cognitive science · 2022Review
- Effortful Retrieval Practice Effects in Lexical Access: A Role for Semantic Competition.Language, cognition and neuroscience · 2022Article
- Is There a Research-Practice Dosage Gap in Aphasia Rehabilitation?American journal of speech-language pathology · 2021Review
- Treating limb apraxia via action semantics: a preliminary study.Neuropsychological rehabilitation · 2021Article
- Intensive naming training for low-educated demented and non-demented elderly.Dementia & neuropsychologia · 2020Article
- Article
- The Application of Lexical Retrieval Training in Tablet-Based Speech-Language Intervention.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Article
- A Review of the Application of Distributed Practice Principles to Naming Treatment in Aphasia.Topics in language disorders · 2020Article
- Long-Term maintenance of anomia treatment effects in primary progressive aphasia.Neuropsychological rehabilitation · 2019Article
- Retrieval practice and spacing effects in multi-session treatment of naming impairment in aphasia.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2019Article
- How Mixed-Effects Modeling Can Advance Our Understanding of Learning and Memory and Improve Clinical and Educational Practice.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2019Article
- Speed-Accuracy Trade-Offs and Adaptation Deficits in Aphasia: Finding the "Sweet Spot" Between Overly Cautious and Incautious Responding.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2019Article
- Semantic interference in speech error production in a randomized continuous naming task: Evidence from aphasia.Language, cognition and neuroscience · 2019Article
- Retention of Stroke Education Provided during Hospitalization: Does Provision of Required Education Increase Stroke Knowledge?Interventional neurology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Because individuals with acquired language disorders are frequently unable to reliably access the names of common everyday objects (i.e., naming impairment), rehabilitation efforts often focus on improving naming. The present study compared 2 rehabilitation strategies for naming impairment, reflecting contradictory prescriptions derived from different theoretical principles. The prescription derived from psychological research on test-enhanced learning advocates providing patients opportunities to retrieve target names from long-term memory (i.e., retrieval practice) in the course of treatment. In contrast, the errorless learning approach derived from cognitive rehabilitation research eschews retrieval practice in favor of methods that minimize naming errors, and thus the potential for error learning, in the course of treatment. The present study directly compared these approaches and showed that, despite superior (and errorless) performance during errorless treatment, treatment that prioritized retrieval practice produced greater retention 1-day and 1-week following treatment. These findings have implications for clinical practice, as well as theoretical accounts of lexical access and test-enhanced learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.