Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25528091›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition2015

Real-time processing of ASL signs: Delayed first language acquisition affects organization of the mental lexicon.

Amy M Lieberman, Arielle Borovsky, Marla Hatrak, Rachel I Mayberry

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 110 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Neurolinguistic processing when the brain matures without language.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Disentangling Linguistic Modality Effects in Semantic Processing.Journal of psycholinguistic research · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amy M LiebermanCenter for Research on Language, University of California, San Diego.
Arielle BorovskyDepartment of Psychology, Florida State University.
Marla HatrakDepartment of Linguistics, University of California, San Diego.
Rachel I MayberryDepartment of Linguistics, University of California, San Diego.
University of California, San Diego · USFlorida State University · US

Funding

Age of Acquisition effects on sign language development and brain processingR01DC012797 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI MAYBERRY, RACHEL I · 2013 to 2023
$6.3M
Eye-gaze shift as a measure of sign language processing in young deaf childrenR03DC011615 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI LIEBERMAN, AMY MICHELLE · 2011 to 2013
$457k
Online language processing and semantic development in late-talking infantsR03DC013638 · NIDCD · FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BOROVSKY, ARIELLE · 2015 to 2017
$439k
Online measures of word recognition and learning in language-delayed toddlersF32DC010106 · NIDCD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BOROVSKY, ARIELLE · 2009 to 2011
$151k
NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC010106NIDCD NIH HHS F32DC10106NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC012797NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC012797NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC011615NIDCD NIH HHS R03DC011615NIDCD NIH HHS R03 DC013638
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sign language comprehension requires visual attention to the linguistic signal and visual attention to referents in the surrounding world, whereas these processes are divided between the auditory and visual modalities for spoken language comprehension. Additionally, the age-onset of first language acquisition and the quality and quantity of linguistic input for deaf individuals is highly heterogeneous, which is rarely the case for hearing learners of spoken languages. Little is known about how these modality and developmental factors affect real-time lexical processing. In this study, we ask how these factors impact real-time recognition of American Sign Language (ASL) signs using a novel adaptation of the visual world paradigm in deaf adults who learned sign from birth (Experiment 1), and in deaf adults who were late-learners of ASL (Experiment 2). Results revealed that although both groups of signers demonstrated rapid, incremental processing of ASL signs, only native signers demonstrated early and robust activation of sublexical features of signs during real-time recognition. Our findings suggest that the organization of the mental lexicon into units of both form and meaning is a product of infant language learning and not the sensory and motor modality through which the linguistic signal is sent and received.

Indexed as

Language DevelopmentPattern Recognition, VisualRecognition, PsychologySign LanguageAdolescentAdultAge FactorsDeafnessEye Movement MeasurementsEye MovementsFemaleHumansLanguage TestsMaleMiddle AgedTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID25528091
PMCPMC4476960
OpenAlexW2334106899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.