Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25527907›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2014

Evaluation of RECIST in chemotherapy-treated lung cancer: the Pharmacogenoscan Study.

Anne-Claire Toffart, Denis Moro-Sibilot, Sébastien Couraud, Patrick Merle, Maurice Perol, Nicolas Girard, Pierre-Jean Souquet, Bénédicte Mastroianni, Gilbert R Ferretti, Philippe Romand and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00222404 (Pharmacogenomic Study Realized Within the Framework of the Common Care to "Non-small Cell Lung Carcinoma" at Any Stages Treated by Chemotherapy.), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00222404 completednot on this map

Pharmacogenomic Study Realized Within the Framework of the Common Care to "Non-small Cell Lung Carcinoma" at Any Stages Treated by Chemotherapy.

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity Hospital, GrenobleRan2005 to 2010Enrolled556ConditionsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Circulating DNA in solid organ cancers-analysis and clinical application.QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Anne-Claire ToffartUniversité Grenoble 1 INSERM U 823-Institut A Bonniot-Université J Fourier, Rond-point de la Chantourne, 38706 La Tronche Cedex, France. AToffart@chu-grenoble.fr.
Denis Moro-Sibilot
Sébastien Couraud
Patrick Merle
Maurice Perol
Nicolas Girard
Pierre-Jean Souquet
Bénédicte Mastroianni
Gilbert R Ferretti
Philippe Romand
Patrick Chatellain
Aurélien Vesin
Elisabeth Brambilla
Christian Brambilla
Jean-François Timsit
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble · FRHospices Civils de Lyon · FRInserm · FRCentre Hospitalier René-Dubos · FRHôpital Albert Michallon · FRHôpital de la Croix-Rousse · FRHôpital Louis Pradel · FRPeuplements végétaux et bioagresseurs en milieu tropical · REUniversité Clermont Auvergne · FRUniversité Grenoble Alpes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) are widely used to assess the effect of chemotherapy in patients with cancer. We hypothesised that the change in unidimensional tumour size handled as a continuous variable was more reliable than RECIST in predicting overall survival (OS).

methodsThe prospective Pharmacogenoscan study enrolled consecutive patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at any stage seen between 2005 and 2010 at six hospitals in France, given chemotherapy. After exclusion of patients without RECIST or continuous-scale tumour size data and of those with early death, 464 patients were left for the survival analyses. Cox models were built to assess relationships between RECIST 1.1 categories or change in continuous-scale tumour size and OS. The best model was defined as the model minimising the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC).

resultsOS was 14.2 months (IQR, 7.3-28.9 months). According to RECIST 1.1, 146 (31%) patients had a partial or complete response, 245 (53%) stable disease, and 73 (16%) disease progression. RECIST 1.1 predicted better OS than continuous-scale tumour in early (<6 months) predicted survival analyses (p = 0.03) but the accuracy of the two response evaluation methods was similar in late (≥6 months) predicted survival analyses (p = 0.15).

conclusionIn this large observational study, change in continuous-scale tumour size did not perform better than RECIST 1.1 in predicting survival of patients given chemotherapy to treat NSCLC.

trial registrationNCT00222404.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungFemaleFollow-Up StudiesFranceHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeoplasm StagingProspective StudiesSurvival AnalysisTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID25527907
PMCPMC4364468
OpenAlexW1633030052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.