Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25527482›Full record

Trial reportInternational urogynecology journal2015

A pilot randomized trial of levator injections versus physical therapy for treatment of pelvic floor myalgia and sexual pain.

Dani Zoorob, Mary South, Mickey Karram, Julie Sroga, Rose Maxwell, Aparna Shah, James Whiteside

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International urogynecology journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03163160 (Intratissue Percutaneous Electrolysis Technique vs. Manual Therapy in Women With Dyspareunia and Pelvic Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03163160 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Intratissue Percutaneous Electrolysis Technique vs. Manual Therapy in Women With Dyspareunia and Pelvic Pain

TypeinterventionalSponsorQuirón Madrid University HospitalRan2017 to 2019Enrolled60ConditionsDyspareunia, Pelvic Pain, Pelvic Floor Disorders, Musculoskeletal PainArmsPelvic floor manual therapy group, Pelvic floor electrolysis group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Anorectal and Pelvic Pain.Mayo Clinic proceedings · 2016
    Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Dani ZoorobDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Female Pelvic Medicine And Reconstructive Surgery, University Of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, MS 2028, Kansas City, KS, 66160, USA, dzobgyn@gmail.com.
Mary South
Mickey Karram
Julie Sroga
Rose Maxwell
Aparna Shah
James Whiteside
Sabin Vaccine Institute · USChrist Hospital · USUniversity of Cincinnati · USUniversity of Kansas Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisOur aim was to determine the effects of pelvic floor physical therapy (PT) and levator-directed trigger-point injections (LTPI) on sexual function and levator-related pelvic pain. STUDY

designA randomized trial among women with pelvic floor myalgia (PFM) was performed wherein participants received either PT or LTPI. Pain was assessed and 1 month posttreatment completion. Levator-based pain was assessed using a numeric rating scale (NRS) and the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) scale. Sexual function was assessed using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI).

resultsTwenty-nine women completed the study (17 had PT, 12 had LTPI). Both groups reported reduction in vaginal pain: mean NRS change from baseline of 4.47 [standard deviation (SD) 2.12) for PT and 4.67 (SD 1.72) for LTPI (p = 0.8)]. A >50 % improvement in NRS was documented among 59 % of women receiving PT and 58 % receiving LTPI (p = 1.0). Consistent with NRS scores, mean PGI-I score was 2.50 (SD 1.17) for PT and 2.17 (SD 1.01) for LTPI (p = 0.5). Mean change in FSFI favored PT [PT +8.87 (SD 5.60), LTPI +4.00 (SD 5.24), p = 0.04], reflecting improvement in the sexual pain domain favoring PT (p = 0.02). However, the time in weeks to effect improvement favored LTPI if controlling for the degree of change in NRS (p = 0.01) and FSFI (p = 0.01).

conclusionsVaginal myalgia and sex-related pain improved with pelvic floor PT and LTPI. Time-to-effect improvement and significance of therapy are dependent on treatment type.

Indexed as

MassageAdultAnesthetics, LocalAnus DiseasesBupivacaineFemaleGlucocorticoidsHumansInjectionsMiddle AgedMyalgiaMyofascial Pain SyndromesPainPelvic Floor DisordersPilot ProjectsTreatment OutcomeAnesthetics, LocalBupivacaineGlucocorticoidsTriamcinolone

Identifiers

PMID25527482
OpenAlexW2012072179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.