SynthesisJournal of general internal medicine2015
Leadership development programs for physicians: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Journal of general internal medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 136 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
136 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 391 citations in OpenAlex.
- Leadership practices and maternal and child health outcomes in Sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review.BMC health services research · 2026Pooled it
- Leadership training in healthcare: a systematic umbrella review.BMJ leader · 2025Pooled it
- Leadership training programs in graduate medical education: a systematic review.BMC medical education · 2020Pooled it
- Healthcare middle managers' experiences of developing capacity and capability: a systematic review and meta-synthesis.BMC health services research · 2019Pooled it
- Is postgraduate leadership education a match for the wicked problems of health systems leadership? A critical systematic review.Perspectives on medical education · 2019Pooled it
- The role of eLearning in health management and leadership capacity building in health system: a systematic review.Human resources for health · 2018Pooled it
- Competitive Advantage of MBA for Physician Executives: A Systematic Literature Review.World journal of surgery · 2018Pooled it
- Leadership Training in Graduate Medical Education: A Systematic Review.Journal of graduate medical education · 2018Pooled it
- Coaching doctors to improve ethical decision-making in adult hospitalized patients potentially receiving excessive treatment. The CODE stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial.Intensive care medicine · 2024Trial
- Leadership program with skills training for general practitioners was highly accepted without improving job satisfaction: the cluster randomized IMPROVEjob study.Scientific reports · 2022Trial
- Stimulating Employability and Job Crafting Behaviour of Physicians: A Randomized Controlled Trial.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Trial
- The Effects of Leadership Curricula With and Without Implicit Bias Training on Graduate Medical Education: A Multicenter Randomized Trial.Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges · 2022Trial
- Curriculum Innovation: A Leadership Training Curriculum for Neurology Residents.Neurology. Education · 2026Article
- Women's leadership development programmes and gender equality: a systematic review in healthcare, academia and beyond.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Qualitative study identifying leadership challenges encountered in real-world scholarly projects within a faculty development program.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Developing Healthcare Leaders: Perspectives on Critical Competencies, Current Gaps, and Training Recommendations.Cureus · 2026Article
- Identifying informal leaders among medical residents as a basis for educational interventions.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Preparing for the End: Job Loss and Resilience for Physician Executives.Journal of healthcare leadership · 2026Article
- E-leadership in distributed new product development teams: unveiling the interplay between performance, team emotional capability, and engagement.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
76 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPhysician leadership development programs typically aim to strengthen physicians' leadership competencies and improve organizational performance. We conducted a systematic review of medical literature on physician leadership development programs in order to characterize the setting, educational content, teaching methods, and learning outcomes achieved.
methodsArticles were identified through a search in Ovid MEDLINE from 1950 through November 2013. We included articles that described programs designed to expose physicians to leadership concepts, outlined teaching methods, and reported evaluation outcomes. A thematic analysis was conducted using a structured data entry form with categories for setting/target group, educational content, format, type of evaluation and outcomes.
resultsWe identified 45 studies that met eligibility criteria, of which 35 reported on programs exclusively targeting physicians. The majority of programs focused on skills training and technical and conceptual knowledge, while fewer programs focused on personal growth and awareness. Half of the studies used pre/post intervention designs, and four studies used a comparison group. Positive outcomes were reported in all studies, although the majority of studies relied on learner satisfaction scores and self-assessed knowledge or behavioral change. Only six studies documented favorable organizational outcomes, such as improvement in quality indicators for disease management. The leadership programs examined in these studies were characterized by the use of multiple learning methods, including lectures, seminars, group work, and action learning projects in multidisciplinary teams. DISCUSSION: Physician leadership development programs are associated with increased self-assessed knowledge and expertise; however, few studies have examined outcomes at a system level. Our synthesis of the literature suggests important gaps, including a lack of programs that integrate non-physician and physician professionals, limited use of more interactive learning and feedback to develop greater self-awareness, and an overly narrow focus on individual-level rather than system-level outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.