Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25527336›Full record

Trial reportJournal of general internal medicine2015

Accuracy of race, ethnicity, and language preference in an electronic health record.

Elissa V Klinger, Sara V Carlini, Irina Gonzalez, Stella St Hubert, Jeffrey A Linder, Nancy A Rigotti, Emily Z Kontos, Elyse R Park, Lucas X Marinacci, Jennifer S Haas

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of general internal medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 159 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
159citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

159 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 235 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. The quality of social determinants data in the electronic health record: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2021
    Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Racial disparities in multiple sclerosis quality of care metrics.Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England) · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

99 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elissa V KlingerDivision of General Medicine and Primary Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 1620 Tremont Street, Boston, MA, 02120, USA.
Sara V Carlini
Irina Gonzalez
Stella St Hubert
Jeffrey A Linder
Nancy A Rigotti
Emily Z Kontos
Elyse R Park
Lucas X Marinacci
Jennifer S Haas
Brigham and Women's Hospital · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Harvard Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR001102 · NCATS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI NADLER, LEE MARSHALL · 2013 to 2017
$106.2M
TRAINING AND CAREER DEVELOPMENTP50CA148596 · NCI · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI SORENSEN, GLORIAN C · 2010 to 2014
$10.7M
NCATS NIH HHS 1UL1 TR001102NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001102NCI NIH HHS P50 CA148596
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCollection of data on race, ethnicity, and language preference is required as part of the "meaningful use" of electronic health records (EHRs). These data serve as a foundation for interventions to reduce health disparities.

objectiveOur aim was to compare the accuracy of EHR-recorded data on race, ethnicity, and language preference to that reported directly by patients. DESIGN/SUBJECTS/MAIN MEASURES: Data collected as part of a tobacco cessation intervention for minority and low-income smokers across a network of 13 primary care clinics (n = 569). KEY

resultsPatients were more likely to self-report Hispanic ethnicity (19.6 % vs. 16.6 %, p < 0.001) and African American race (27.0 % vs. 20.4 %, p < 0.001) than was reported in the EHR. Conversely, patients were less likely to complete the survey in Spanish than the language preference noted in the EHR suggested (5.1 % vs. 6.3 %, p < 0.001). Thirty percent of whites self-reported identification with at least one other racial or ethnic group, as did 37.0 % of Hispanics, and 41.0 % of African Americans. Over one-third of EHR-documented Spanish speakers elected to take the survey in English. One-fifth of individuals who took the survey in Spanish were recorded in the EHR as English-speaking.

conclusionWe demonstrate important inaccuracies and the need for better processes to document race/ ethnicity and language preference in EHRs.

Indexed as

LanguageAdultAgedDocumentationElectronic Health RecordsEthnicityFemaleHealth Status DisparitiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRacial GroupsSelf ReportSmoking CessationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID25527336
PMCPMC4441665
OpenAlexW2088121266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.