ArticleBMC evolutionary biology2014
Temporal genomic evolution of bird sex chromosomes.
Article in BMC evolutionary biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evidence that genetic drift not adaptation drives fast-Z and large-Z effects in Ficedula flycatchers.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- The genomics of the domestication syndrome in a songbird model species.Communications biology · 2025Article
- The Cause-Effect Model of Master Sex Determination Gene Acquisition and the Evolution of Sex Chromosomes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Satellitome analysis on the pale-breasted thrush Turdus leucomelas (Passeriformes; Turdidae) uncovers the putative co-evolution of sex chromosomes and satellite DNAs.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Role-reversed polyandry is associated with faster fast-Z in shorebirds.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Article
- Evolution of bird sex chromosomes: a cytogenomic approach in Palaeognathae species.BMC ecology and evolution · 2024Article
- Review
- Highlighting chromosomal rearrangements of five species of Galliformes (Domestic fowl, Common and Japanese quail, Barbary and Chukar partridge) and the Houbara bustard, an endangered Otidiformes: banding cytogenetic is a powerful tool.Comparative cytogenetics · 2024Article
- Following the Pathway of W Chromosome Differentiation inBiology · 2023Article
- Differing associations between sex determination and sex-linked inversions in two ecotypes ofEvolution letters · 2022Article
- Article
- Support for faster and more adaptive Z chromosome evolution in two divergent lepidopteran lineagesEvolution; international journal of organic evolution · 2022Article
- Comparative Population Genomics of Cryptic Speciation and Adaptive Divergence in Bicknell's and Gray-Cheeked Thrushes (Aves: Catharus bicknelli and Catharus minimus).Genome biology and evolution · 2022Article
- Fourth Report on Chicken Genes and Chromosomes 2022.Cytogenetic and genome research · 2022Review
- A new emu genome illuminates the evolution of genome configuration and nuclear architecture of avian chromosomes.Genome research · 2021Article
- Locating the Sex Determining Region of Linkage Group 12 of Guppy (G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2020Article
- Article
- A Study of Faster-Z Evolution in the Great Tit (Parus major).Genome biology and evolution · 2020Article
- Regional epigenetic differentiation of the Z Chromosome between sexes in a female heterogametic system.Genome research · 2019Article
- Evolutionary Dynamics of Sex Chromosomes of Paleognathous Birds.Genome biology and evolution · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSex chromosomes exhibit many unusual patterns in sequence and gene expression relative to autosomes. Birds have evolved a female heterogametic sex system (male ZZ, female ZW), through stepwise suppression of recombination between chrZ and chrW. To address the broad patterns and complex driving forces of Z chromosome evolution, we analyze here 45 newly available bird genomes and four species' transcriptomes, over their course of recombination loss between the sex chromosomes.
resultsWe show Z chromosomes in general have a significantly higher substitution rate in introns and synonymous protein-coding sites than autosomes, driven by the male-to-female mutation bias ('male-driven evolution' effect). Our genome-wide estimate reveals that the degree of such a bias ranges from 1.6 to 3.8 among different species. G + C content of third codon positions exhibits the same trend of gradual changes with that of introns, between chrZ and autosomes or regions with increasing ages of becoming Z-linked, therefore codon usage bias in birds is probably driven by the mutational bias. On the other hand, Z chromosomes also evolve significantly faster at nonsynonymous sites relative to autosomes ('fast-Z' evolution). And species with a lower level of intronic heterozygosities tend to evolve even faster on the Z chromosome. Further analysis of fast-evolving genes' enriched functional categories and sex-biased expression patterns support that, fast-Z evolution in birds is mainly driven by genetic drift. Finally, we show in species except for chicken, gene expression becomes more male-biased within Z-linked regions that have became hemizygous in females for a longer time, suggesting a lack of global dosage compensation in birds, and the reported regional dosage compensation in chicken has only evolved very recently.
conclusionsIn conclusion, we uncover that the sequence and expression patterns of Z chromosome genes covary with their ages of becoming Z-linked. In contrast to the mammalian X chromosomes, such patterns are mainly driven by mutational bias and genetic drift in birds, due to the opposite sex-biased inheritance of Z vs. X.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.