Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25527152›Full record

SynthesisTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2015

Circulating microRNA-21 as a biomarker for the detection of various carcinomas: an updated meta-analysis based on 36 studies.

Kailiu Wu, Liwen Li, Siyi Li

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Molecular Pathology of Lung Cancer.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kailiu WuDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial-head and Neck Oncology, Ninth People's Hospital, College of Stomatology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai Key Laboratory of Stomatology, Shanghai, 200011, China.
Liwen Li
Siyi Li

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer is a class of diseases with high mortality rate, characterized by unregulated cell growth. Early diagnosis of cancer is currently the most effective method to prevent cancer development and improve the survival rate of patients. Traditional diagnostic methods such as biopsy usually provoke discomfort and unpleasant experience. Recently, microRNAs (miRNAs) were widely reported to be potential biomarkers to detect cancers without invasiveness. MicroRNA-21 (miRNA-21, miR-21) is one of the most prevalent miRNAs. This meta-analysis aims to make a comprehensive analysis of the potential role of circulating miR-21 as a biomarker in human carcinoma diagnosis. A total of 36 articles involving 2920 cancer patients and 1986 healthy controls with regard to the diagnostic value of the circulating miR-21 for cancer detection were selected from online bibliographic databases. For pooled analysis, the sensitivity, specificity, and other basic characteristics were extracted from the 36 included articles. Then, bivariate random-effects model was selected to gain pooled results. Furthermore, to explore the sources of heterogeneity, we conducted stratified and meta-regression analyses based on different race/sample groups. The pooled characteristics of all included articles were as follows: sensitivity, 0.78 (95% confidence intervals (CI), 0.73-0.82); specificity, 0.82 (95% CI, 0.79-0.86); positive likelihood ratio (PLR), 4.4 (95% CI, 3.6-5.4); negative likelihood ratio (NLR), 0.26 (95% CI, 0.21-0.33); diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), 17 (95% CI, 12-24); and area under the curve (AUC), 0.87 (95% CI, 0.84-0.90). The subgroup analyses results based on different ethnic populations revealed that the diagnostic accuracy of miR-21 tends to be higher in Asian populations than in Caucasian populations. Furthermore, another subgroup analysis performed on sample types suggested that the serum-based specimen used in cancer diagnosis appeared to be more accurate than the plasma-based specimen. Our meta-analysis shows that the circulating miR-21 may be a potential biomarker as diagnostic tool for early-stage cancer diagnosis.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCarcinomaCase-Control StudiesHumansMicroRNAsRegression AnalysisSensitivity and SpecificityBiomarkers, TumorMicroRNAsMIRN21 microRNA, human

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.