ArticleJournal of vision2014
Visual field asymmetries in visual evoked responses.
Article in Journal of vision, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Improving source estimation of retinotopic MEG responses by combining data from multiple subjects.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Bypassing input to V1 in visual awareness: A TMS-EROS investigation.Neuropsychologia · 2024Article
- Fullfield and extrafoveal visual evoked potentials in healthy eyes: reference data for a curved OLED display.Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Improved correspondence of fMRI visual field localizer data after cortex-based macroanatomical alignment.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Visual attention around a hand location localized by proprioceptive information.Cerebral cortex communications · 2022Article
- Dynamics of Contrast Decrement and Increment Responses in Human Visual Cortex.Translational vision science & technology · 2020Article
- Anatomic and functional asymmetries interactively shape human early visual cortex responses.Journal of vision · 2020Article
- Contrast Normalization Accounts for Binocular Interactions in Human Striate and Extra-striate Visual Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020Article
- Shorter fixation durations for up-directed saccades during saccadic exploration: A meta-analysis.Journal of eye movement research · 2020Article
- Detailed spatiotemporal brain mapping of chromatic vision combining high-resolution VEP with fMRI and retinotopy.Human brain mapping · 2018Article
- Violated Expectations in the Cyberball Paradigm: Testing the Expectancy Account of Social Participation With ERP.Frontiers in psychology · 2018Article
- Hemispheric differences in electrical and hemodynamic responses during hemifield visual stimulation with graded contrasts.Biomedical optics express · 2017Article
- Structural and functional correlates of visual field asymmetry in the human brain by diffusion kurtosis MRI and functional MRI.Neuroreport · 2016Article
- Radial Frequency Analysis of Contour Shapes in the Visual Cortex.PLoS computational biology · 2016Article
- Influence of BOLD Contributions to Diffusion fMRI Activation of the Visual Cortex.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2016Article
- Sensitivity to the visual field origin of natural image patches in human low-level visual cortex.PeerJ · 2015Article
- Topographic organization of areas V3 and V4 and its relation to supra-areal organization of the primate visual system.Visual neuroscience · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Behavioral responses to visual stimuli exhibit visual field asymmetries, but cortical folding and the close proximity of visual cortical areas make electrophysiological comparisons between different stimulus locations problematic. Retinotopy-constrained source estimation (RCSE) uses distributed dipole models simultaneously constrained by multiple stimulus locations to provide separation between individual visual areas that is not possible with conventional source estimation methods. Magnetoencephalography and RCSE were used to estimate time courses of activity in V1, V2, V3, and V3A. Responses to left and right hemifield stimuli were not significantly different. Peak latencies for peripheral stimuli were significantly shorter than those for perifoveal stimuli in V1, V2, and V3A, likely related to the greater proportion of magnocellular input to V1 in the periphery. Consistent with previous results, sensor magnitudes for lower field stimuli were about twice as large as for upper field, which is only partially explained by the proximity to sensors for lower field cortical sources in V1, V2, and V3. V3A exhibited both latency and amplitude differences for upper and lower field responses. There were no differences for V3, consistent with previous suggestions that dorsal and ventral V3 are two halves of a single visual area, rather than distinct areas V3 and VP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.