Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25526752›Full record

ArticleBMC genetics2014

A chloroplast genomic strategy for designing taxon specific DNA mini-barcodes: a case study on ginsengs.

Wenpan Dong, Han Liu, Chao Xu, Yunjuan Zuo, Zhongjian Chen, Shiliang Zhou

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed, 181 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Chloroplast genome sequencing and phylogenetic analysis ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The complete chloroplast genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Wenpan DongState Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100093, China. wpdong@ibcas.ac.cn.
Han LiuState Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100093, China. loolarloo@gmail.com.
Chao XuState Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100093, China. xuchao@ibcas.ac.cn.
Yunjuan ZuoShanghai Chenshan Plant Science Research Center, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden, Shanghai, 201602, China. zuoyunjuan@tom.com.
Zhongjian ChenInstitute of Sanqi Research, Wenshan College, Wenshan, 663000, Yunnan, China. 08765173@163.com.
Shiliang ZhouState Key Laboratory of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany, Institute of Botany, the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100093, China. slzhou@ibcas.ac.cn.
Institute of Botany · CNChinese Academy of Sciences · CNWenshan University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUniversal conventional DNA barcodes will become more and more popular in biological material identifications. However, in many cases such as processed medicines or canned food, the universal conventional barcodes are unnecessary and/or inapplicable due to DNA degradation. DNA mini-barcode is a solution for such specific purposes. Here we exemplify how to develop the best mini-barcodes for specific taxa using the ginseng genus (Panax) as an example.

resultsThe chloroplast genome of P. notoginseng was sequenced. The genome was compared with that of P. ginseng. Regions of the highest variability were sought out. The shortest lengths which had the same discrimination powers of conventional lengths were considered the best mini-barcodes. The results showed that the chloroplast genome of P. notoginseng is 156,387 bp. There are only 464 (0.30%) substitutions between the two genomes. The intron of rps16 and two regions of the coding gene ycf1, ycf1a and ycf1b, evolved the quickest and served as candidate regions. The mini-barcodes of Panax turned out to be 60 bp for ycf1a at a discrimination power of 91.67%, 100 bp for ycf1b at 100%, and 280 bp for rps16 at 83.33%.

conclusionsThe strategy by searching the whole chloroplast genomes, identifying the most variable regions, shortening the focal regions for mini-barcodes are believed to be efficient in developing taxon-specific DNA mini-barcodes. The best DNA mini-barcodes are guaranteed to be found following this strategy.

Indexed as

Genome, ChloroplastDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicGenes, PlantGenetic MarkersPanaxSequence Analysis, DNAGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID25526752
PMCPMC4293818
OpenAlexW1973370588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.