ArticleNeuro-oncology2015
Imaging of gliomas at 1.5 and 3 Tesla - A comparative study.
Article in Neuro-oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of a candidate biomarker from perfusion MRI to anticipate glioblastoma progression after chemoradiation.European radiology · 2016Trial
- Improved detection of brain metastases using contrast-enhanced 3D black-blood TSE sequences compared to post-contrast 3D T1 GRE: a comparative study on 1.5-T MRI.European radiology · 2025Article
- How to evaluate perfusion imaging in post-treatment glioma: a comparison of three different analysis methods.Neuroradiology · 2024Article
- Ventricular entry during surgical resection is associated with intracranial leptomeningeal dissemination in glioblastoma patients.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2022Article
- The Promise of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Radiation Oncology Practice in the Management of Brain, Prostate, and GI Malignancies.JCO global oncology · 2022Review
- Intraoperative 3 T MRI is more correlative to residual disease extent than early postoperative MRI.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2021Article
- Standardization of brain MR images across machines and protocols: bridging the gap for MRI-based radiomics.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Imaging growth as a predictor of grade of malignancy and aggressiveness of IDH-mutant and 1p/19q-codeleted oligodendrogliomas in adults.Neuro-oncology · 2020Article
- Progression of Contralateral Hearing Loss in Patients With Sporadic Vestibular Schwannoma.Frontiers in neurology · 2020Article
- Article
- Early perfusion MRI predicts survival outcome in patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab and carboplatin.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2017Article
- Intra-rater variability in low-grade glioma segmentation.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2017Article
- Detection superiority of 7 T MRI protocol in patients with epilepsy and suspected focal cortical dysplasia.Acta neurologica Belgica · 2016Article
- A novel vascular model yields increased MR perfusion metrics compared to conventional dynamic susceptibility contrast algorithms in untreated glioblastoma.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGlioma follow-up is based on MRI parameters, which are correlated with survival. Although established criteria are used to evaluate tumor response, radiological markers may be confounded by differences in instrumentation including the magnetic field strength. We assessed whether MRIs obtained at 3 Tesla (T) and 1.5T provided similar information.
methodsWe retrospectively compared imaging features of 30 consecutive patients with WHO grades II and III gliomas who underwent MRI at 1.5T and 3T within a month of each other, without any clinical changes during the same period. We compared lesion volumes on fluid attenuation inversion recovery (FLAIR), ratio of cerebral blood volume (rCBV) on perfusion-weighted imaging, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) on FLAIR, and on post-gadolinium 3D T1-weighted sequences between 1.5T and 3T using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Concordance between observers within and between modalities was evaluated using weighted-kappa coefficient (wκ).
resultsThe mean ± SD delay between modalities (1.5T and 3T MRI) was 8.6 ± 5.6 days. Interobserver/intraobserver concordance for lesion volume was almost perfect for 1.5T (ICC = 0.96/0.97) and 3T (ICC = 0.99/0.98). Agreement between observers for contrast enhancement was excellent at 1.5T (wκ = 0.92) and 3T (wκ = 0.92). The tumor CNR was significantly higher for FLAIR at 1.5T (P < .001), but it was higher at 3T (P = .012) for contrast enhancement. Correlations between modalities for lesion volume (ICC = 0.97) and for rCBV values (ICC = 0.92) were almost perfect.
conclusionsIn the follow-up of WHO grades II and III gliomas, 1.5T and 3T provide similar MRI features, suggesting that monitoring could be performed on either a 1.5 or a 3T MR magnet.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.