Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25526712›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2015

Bone health management in men undergoing ADT: examining enablers and barriers to care.

A N Damji, K Bies, S M H Alibhai, J M Jones

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Author response to 01530, Proactive strategies for fracture risk in androgen deprivation therapy: a call for multidisciplinary collaboration.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Canadian Urological Association best practice report: Bone health in prostate cancer.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2021
    Article
  11. Cancer patients with fractures are rarely assessed or treated for osteoporosis: a population-based study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Adverse bone effects of medications used to treat non-skeletal disorders.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2017
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Mind the (treatment) gap: a global perspective on current and future strategies for prevention of fragility fractures.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2017
    Review
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

A N DamjiUndergraduate Medical Education Program, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
K Bies
S M H Alibhai
J M Jones
University of Toronto · CAUniversity Health Network · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledThe study determined prostate cancer specialists' knowledge and concordance to guidelines regarding the diagnosis, management, and prevention of androgen deprivation therapy-induced osteoporosis. Despite high knowledge regarding bone health, most respondents did not routinely measure bone mineral density or use fracture risk assessment tools, suggesting a significant gap in the screening/monitoring of bone health.

introductionThe purpose of this study was to determine prostate cancer specialists' knowledge, practices, self-perceived competencies and barriers to providing guideline-concordant care in the diagnosis, prevention, and management of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT)-induced osteoporosis (OP).

methodsA number of 73 Canadian radiation oncologists and 83 urologists completed questionnaires assessing (i) knowledge regarding OP and consensus guidelines for bone health management in men receiving ADT, (ii) self-assessed competencies regarding bone health management, (iii) current practices regarding OP prevention and management, and (iv) self-perceived barriers to providing guideline-concordant care.

resultsThe majority of respondents were able to correctly identify the guideline-concordant frequency of repeat dual-energy X-Ray absorptiometry (DXA) scans (76.3%), vitamin D (70.3%), and calcium (53.2%) intake and that bisphosphonates/denosumab should always be considered for patients with a history of one low-trauma fracture (57.6%). Just under 1/3 (32.5%) reported routinely measuring bone mineral density (BMD) prior to starting ADT and routinely measuring BMD 1-2 years following the initiation of ADT (36.6%). Only 4.6% of respondents routinely used a validated fracture risk assessment tool. Lowest self-assessed competency levels were reported in providing self-management education to patients to foster the uptake of healthy bone behaviors (HBBs) and managing patients who present with or develop osteopenia and OP. The most significant barriers to providing OP prevention and management were lack of time and lack of supporting structures.

conclusionsDespite high knowledge about appropriate bone health care among prostate cancer specialists, there remain significant gaps in screening and monitoring of bone health, suggesting the need to develop innovative strategies to overcome barriers to implementation.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceAndrogen AntagonistsAttitude of Health PersonnelBone Density Conservation AgentsCanadaCross-Sectional StudiesGuideline AdherenceHumansMaleOsteoporosisOsteoporotic FracturesPractice Guidelines as TopicProfessional PracticeProstatic NeoplasmsRisk AssessmentAndrogen AntagonistsBone Density Conservation Agents

Identifiers

PMID25526712
OpenAlexW2064706120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.