Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25526617›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Investigating glutamatergic mechanism in attention and impulse control using rats in a modified 5-choice serial reaction time task.

Abigail Benn, Emma S J Robinson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Control of impulsivity by GCommunications biology · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Role of the medial prefrontal cortex in the effects of rapid acting antidepressants on decision-making biases in rodents.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Let's call the whole thing off: evaluating gender and sex differences in executive function.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2019
    Review
  18. Prefrontal cortex executive processes affected by stress in health and disease.Progress in neuro-psychopharmacology & biological psychiatry · 2018
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Behavioural and computational methods reveal differential effects for how delayed and rapid onset antidepressants effect decision making in rats.European neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Abigail BennDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, School of Medical and Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
Emma S J RobinsonDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, School of Medical and Veterinary Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.
University of Bristol · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0700980Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 084621/Z/08/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The 5-choice serial reaction time task (5CSRTT) has been widely used to study attention and impulse control in rodents. In order to mimic cognitive impairments in psychiatry, one approach has been to use acute administration of NMDA antagonists. This disruption in glutamatergic transmission leads to impairments in accuracy, omissions, and premature responses although findings have been inconsistent. In this study, we further investigated glutamatergic mechanisms using a novel version of the 5CSRTT, which we have previously shown to be more sensitive to cognitive enhancers. We first investigated the effects of systemic treatment with NMDA antagonists. We also carried out a preliminary investigation using targeted medial prefrontal cortex infusions of a NMDA antagonist (MK801), mGluR2/3 antagonist (LY341495), and mGluR7 negative allosteric modulator (MMPIP). Acute systemic administration of the different NMDA antagonists had no specific effects on accuracy. At higher doses PCP, ketamine, and memantine, increased omissions and affected other measures suggesting a general disruption in task performance. Only MK801 increased premature responses, and reduced omissions at lower doses suggesting stimulant like effects. None of the NMDA antagonists affected accuracy or any other measures when tested using a short stimulus challenge. Infusions of MK801 had no effect on accuracy but increased premature responses following infralimbic, but not prelimbic infusion. LY341495 had no effects in either brain region but a decrease in accuracy was observed following prelimbic infusion of MMPIP. Contrary to our hypothesis, disruptions to glutamate transmission using NMDA antagonists did not induce any clear deficits in accuracy in this modified version of the 5CSRTT. We also found that the profile of effects for MK801 differed from those observed with PCP, ketamine, and memantine. The effects of MK801 in the infralimbic cortex add to the literature indicating this brain region and glutamate play an important role in impulse control.

Indexed as

Amino AcidsAnimalsAttentionDisease Models, AnimalDizocilpine MaleateDose-Response Relationship, DrugExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsImpulsive BehaviorMaleN-MethylaspartatePrefrontal CortexRatsReaction TimeXanthenesAmino AcidsDizocilpine MaleateExcitatory Amino Acid AntagonistsLY 341495N-MethylaspartateXanthenes

Identifiers

PMID25526617
PMCPMC4272291
OpenAlexW2063130669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.