ReviewThe International journal of neuroscience2015
Proceedings of the Second Annual Deep Brain Stimulation Think Tank: What's in the Pipeline.
Review in The International journal of neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bilateral deep brain stimulation of the fornix for Alzheimer's disease: surgical safety in the ADvance trial.Journal of neurosurgery · 2016Trial
- Electrical neurostimulation in glaucoma with progressive vision loss.Bioelectronic medicine · 2022Article
- Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Deep Brain Stimulation Think Tank: Advances in Neurophysiology, Adaptive DBS, Virtual Reality, Neuroethics and Technology.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Article
- The Use of Deep Brain Stimulation in Tourette Syndrome.Brain sciences · 2016Review
- Phase-amplitude coupling, an indication of bursting in parkinsonism, is masked by periodic pulses.Journal of neurophysiology · 2016Article
- The Striatum and Subthalamic Nucleus as Independent and Collaborative Structures in Motor Control.Frontiers in systems neuroscience · 2016Review
- The Subthalamic Nucleus, Limbic Function, and Impulse Control.Neuropsychology review · 2015Review
- Toward sophisticated basal ganglia neuromodulation: Review on basal ganglia deep brain stimulation.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
47 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The proceedings of the 2nd Annual Deep Brain Stimulation Think Tank summarize the most contemporary clinical, electrophysiological, and computational work on DBS for the treatment of neurological and neuropsychiatric disease and represent the insights of a unique multidisciplinary ensemble of expert neurologists, neurosurgeons, neuropsychologists, psychiatrists, scientists, engineers and members of industry. Presentations and discussions covered a broad range of topics, including advocacy for DBS, improving clinical outcomes, innovations in computational models of DBS, understanding of the neurophysiology of Parkinson's disease (PD) and Tourette syndrome (TS) and evolving sensor and device technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.