Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25526495›Full record

Trial reportMedicine2014

Artificial liver support system improves short- and long-term outcomes of patients with HBV-associated acute-on-chronic liver failure: a single-center experience.

Gang Qin, Jian-Guo Shao, Bin Wang, Yi Shen, Jian Zheng, Xian-Jin Liu, You-Yi Zhang, Yan-Mei Liu, Yan Qin, Lu-Jun Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Observational
  12. Extracorporeal liver support and liver transplantation for acute-on-chronic liver failure.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2025
    Review
  13. Potential therapies for acute-on-chronic liver failure.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gang QinFrom the Center for Liver Diseases (GQ, J-GS, BW, X-JL, Y-YZ, L-JW), Nantong Third People's Hospital, Nantong University; Department of Biostatistics (YS, Y-ML), School of Public Health, Nantong University, Jiangsu, China; Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine (JZ), Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; and Department of Internal Medicine (YQ), Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.
Jian-Guo Shao
Bin Wang
Yi Shen
Jian Zheng
Xian-Jin Liu
You-Yi Zhang
Yan-Mei Liu
Yan Qin
Lu-Jun Wang
Bridge University · SS

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF), artificial liver support system (ALSS) may help prolong lifespan and function as a bridge to liver transplantation (LT), but data on its long-term benefit are lacking. We conducted this prospective, controlled study to determine the efficacy of ALSS and the predictors of mortality in patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-associated ACLF.From January 2003 to December 2007, a total of 234 patients with HBV-associated ACLF not eligible for LT were enrolled in our study. They were allocated to receive either plasma exchange centered ALSS plus standard medical therapy (SMT) (ALSS group, n=104) or SMT alone (control group, n=130). All the patients were followed-up for at least 5 years, or until death.At 90 days, the survival rate of ALSS group was higher than that of the control group (62/104 [60%] vs 61/130 [47%], respectively; P<0.05). Median survival was 879 days in the ALSS group (43% survival at 5 years) and 649 days in the control group (31% survival at 5 years, log-rank P<0.05). ALSS was found to be associated with favorable outcome of these patients by both univariate and multivariate analysis. Multivariate Cox regression analysis also revealed that lower serum sodium levels, higher grades of encephalopathy, presence of cirrhosis, hepatorenal syndrome, and higher model for end-stage liver disease scores were independent predictors for both 90-day and 5-year mortality due to ACLF.Our findings suggest that ALSS is safe and may improve the short- and long-term prognosis of patients with HBV-associated ACLF.

Indexed as

Liver, ArtificialAcute-On-Chronic Liver FailureAdultChinaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHepatitis BHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisSurvival RateTime FactorsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID25526495
PMCPMC4603116
OpenAlexW1964813568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.