ArticleMedicine2014
Comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of 5 image sets of dual-energy computed tomography for detecting first-pass myocardial perfusion defects compared with positron emission tomography.
Article in Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical value of resting cardiac dual-energy CT in patients suspected of coronary artery disease.BMC medical imaging · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The sensitivity and specificity of 5 different image sets of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) for the detection of first-pass myocardial perfusion defects have not systematically been compared using positron emission tomography (PET) as a reference standard. Forty-nine consecutive patients, with known or strongly suspected of coronary artery disease, were prospectively enrolled in our study. Cardiac DECT was performed at rest state using a second-generation 128-slice dual-source CT. The DECT data were reconstructed to iodine maps, monoenergetic images, 100 kV images, nonlinearly blended images, and linearly blended images by different postprocessing techniques. The myocardial perfusion defects on DECT images were visually assessed by 5 observers, using standard 17-segment model. Diagnostic accuracy of 5 image sets was assessed using nitrogen-13 ammonia PET as the gold standard. Discrimination was quantified using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and AUCs were compared using the method of DeLong. The DECT and PET examinations were successfully completed in 30 patients and a total of 90 territories and 510 segments were analyzed. Cardiac PET revealed myocardial perfusion defects in 56 territories (62%) and 209 segments (41%). The AUC of iodine maps, monoenergetic images, 100 kV images, nonlinearly blended images, and linearly blended images were 0.986, 0.934, 0.913, 0.881, and 0.871, respectively, on a per-territory basis. These values were 0.922, 0.813, 0.779, 0.763, and 0.728, respectively, on a per-segment basis. DECT iodine maps shows high sensitivity and specificity, and is superior to other DECT image sets for the detection of myocardial perfusion defects in the first-pass myocardial perfusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.