Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25526492›Full record

ArticleMedicine2014

Comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of 5 image sets of dual-energy computed tomography for detecting first-pass myocardial perfusion defects compared with positron emission tomography.

Wenhuan Li, Xiaolian Zhu, Jing Li, Cheng Peng, Nan Chen, Zhigang Qi, Qi Yang, Yan Gao, Yang Zhao, Kai Sun and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Wenhuan LiFrom the Department of Radiology (WL, XZ, NC, ZQ, QY, YG, YZ, KS, KL); Department of Cardiology (JL); and PET Centre (CP), Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xiaolian Zhu
Jing Li
Cheng Peng
Nan Chen
Zhigang Qi
Qi Yang
Yan Gao
Yang Zhao
Kai Sun
Kuncheng Li

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The sensitivity and specificity of 5 different image sets of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) for the detection of first-pass myocardial perfusion defects have not systematically been compared using positron emission tomography (PET) as a reference standard. Forty-nine consecutive patients, with known or strongly suspected of coronary artery disease, were prospectively enrolled in our study. Cardiac DECT was performed at rest state using a second-generation 128-slice dual-source CT. The DECT data were reconstructed to iodine maps, monoenergetic images, 100 kV images, nonlinearly blended images, and linearly blended images by different postprocessing techniques. The myocardial perfusion defects on DECT images were visually assessed by 5 observers, using standard 17-segment model. Diagnostic accuracy of 5 image sets was assessed using nitrogen-13 ammonia PET as the gold standard. Discrimination was quantified using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and AUCs were compared using the method of DeLong. The DECT and PET examinations were successfully completed in 30 patients and a total of 90 territories and 510 segments were analyzed. Cardiac PET revealed myocardial perfusion defects in 56 territories (62%) and 209 segments (41%). The AUC of iodine maps, monoenergetic images, 100 kV images, nonlinearly blended images, and linearly blended images were 0.986, 0.934, 0.913, 0.881, and 0.871, respectively, on a per-territory basis. These values were 0.922, 0.813, 0.779, 0.763, and 0.728, respectively, on a per-segment basis. DECT iodine maps shows high sensitivity and specificity, and is superior to other DECT image sets for the detection of myocardial perfusion defects in the first-pass myocardial perfusion.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultidetector Computed TomographyPositron-Emission TomographyPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesROC Curve

Identifiers

PMID25526492
PMCPMC4603095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.