Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25526308›Full record

ArticleImmunity2014

Noncanonical mode of ERK action controls alternative αβ and γδ T cell lineage fates.

Sang-Yun Lee, Francis Coffey, Shawn P Fahl, Suraj Peri, Michele Rhodes, Kathy Q Cai, Michael Carleton, Stephen M Hedrick, Hans Joerg Fehling, Juan Carlos Zúñiga-Pflücker and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Immunity, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. HEB collaborates with TCR signaling to upregulatebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. T Cell Development: From T-Lineage Specification to Intrathymic Maturation.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. γδ T cells: origin and fate, subsets, diseases and immunotherapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023
    Review
  10. Development of γδ T Cells: Soldiers on the Front Lines of Immune Battles.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sang-Yun LeeBlood Cell Development and Cancer Keystone, Immune Cell Development and Host Defense Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111-2497, USA.
Francis CoffeyBlood Cell Development and Cancer Keystone, Immune Cell Development and Host Defense Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111-2497, USA.
Shawn P FahlBlood Cell Development and Cancer Keystone, Immune Cell Development and Host Defense Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111-2497, USA.
Suraj PeriDepartment of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111-2497, USA.
Michele RhodesBlood Cell Development and Cancer Keystone, Immune Cell Development and Host Defense Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111-2497, USA.
Kathy Q CaiCancer Biology Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA19111-2497, USA.
Michael CarletonRosetta Inpharmatics LLC, 12040 115th Avenue NE, Suite 210 Kirkland, WA 98034, USA.
Stephen M HedrickDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Medicine and Division of Biological Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Hans Joerg FehlingInstitute of Immunology, University Clinics Ulm, 89081, Germany.
Juan Carlos Zúñiga-PflückerSunnybrook Research Institute, and the Department of Immunology, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada.
Dietmar J KappesBlood Cell Development and Cancer Keystone, Immune Cell Development and Host Defense Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111-2497, USA.
David L WiestBlood Cell Development and Cancer Keystone, Immune Cell Development and Host Defense Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111-2497, USA. Electronic address: david.wiest@fccc.edu.
Fox Chase Cancer Center · USRosetta Stone (United States) · USUniversity of California, San Diego · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

WORD PROCESSING CENTER--COREP30CA006927 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI Margaret von Mehren · 1985 to 2026
$138.8M
VIRAL MALIGNANCYP30CA023100 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI DIANE M SIMEONE · 1985 to 2026
$124.9M
TRANSGENIC AND CHIMERIC MOUSE COREP30DK050306 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Ken Hashigiwa Cadwell · 1997 to 2026
$32.5M
The role of TCR, ligand, and signal strength in human γδ T cell developmentP01AI102853 · NIAID · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI DAVID L. WIEST · 2014 to 2026
$26.3M
TRAINING PROGRAM IN CANCER RESEARCHT32CA009035 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI CHERNOFF, JONATHAN · 1985 to 2020
$10.5M
CELL BIOLOGY &GENETICS OF THYMOCYTE NEGATIVE SELECTIONR01AI037988 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI HEDRICK, STEPHEN M · 1995 to 2015
$5.0M
Control of alpha-beta/gamma-delta T Lineage CommitmentR01AI081314 · NIAID · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI WIEST, DAVID L. · 2009 to 2013
$2.1M
Role of RPL22 in Thymocyte DevelopmentR01AI073920 · NIAID · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI WIEST, DAVID L. · 2007 to 2011
$2.1M
Control of Gamma-Delta T Cell Lineage CommitmentF32AI098241 · NIAID · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI COFFEY, FRANCIS J. · 2012 to 2013
$106k
Canadian Institutes of Health Research MOP-42387NCI NIH HHS P01CA06927NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006927NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023100NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009035NCI NIH HHS T32CA903536NIAID NIH HHS F32 AI098241NIAID NIH HHS F32AI098241NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI102853NIAID NIH HHS P01AI102853NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI037988NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI073920NIAID NIH HHS R01AI073920NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI081314NIAID NIH HHS R01AI081314NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK050306NIDDK NIH HHS P30-DK-50306
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gradations in extracellular regulated kinase (ERK) signaling have been implicated in essentially every developmental checkpoint or differentiation process encountered by lymphocytes. Yet, despite intensive effort, the molecular basis by which differences in ERK activation specify alternative cell fates remains poorly understood. We report here that differential ERK signaling controls lymphoid-fate specification through an alternative mode of action. While ERK phosphorylates most substrates, such as RSK, by targeting them through its D-domain, this well-studied mode of ERK action was dispensable for development of γδ T cells. Instead, development of γδ T cells was dependent upon an alternative mode of action mediated by the DEF-binding pocket (DBP) of ERK. This domain enabled ERK to bind a distinct and select set of proteins required for specification of the γδ fate. These data provide the first in vivo demonstration for the role of DBP-mediated interactions in orchestrating alternate ERK-dependent developmental outcomes.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell DifferentiationCell LineageCells, CulturedEnzyme ActivationExtracellular Signal-Regulated MAP KinasesMiceMice, KnockoutMice, Mutant StrainsMice, TransgenicProtein BindingProtein Interaction Domains and MotifsProtein StabilityReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, alpha-betaReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, gamma-deltaSignal TransductionExtracellular Signal-Regulated MAP KinasesReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, alpha-betaReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, gamma-delta

Identifiers

PMID25526308
PMCPMC4273651
OpenAlexW2132117638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.