Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25526057›Full record

ReviewLab animal2015

A risk-based approach to reducing exposure of staff to laboratory animal allergens.

Lynda Westall, Ian R Graham, James Bussell

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Lab animal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A novel ambient air sampler for detection of allergens and endotoxin.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2026
    Article
  2. Reuse of Disposable Isolation Gowns in Rodent Facilities during a Pandemic.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2021
    Article
  3. Occupational Animal Allergy.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2018
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Laboratory Animal Allergy in the Modern Era.Current allergy and asthma reports · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lynda WestallWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK.
Ian R GrahamWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK.
James BussellWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, UK.
Wellcome Sanger Institute · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Within the biomedical research industry, people who work with laboratory animals may be at risk of developing laboratory animal allergy, which can lead to occupational asthma. Under UK and EU laws, employers must prevent or adequately control exposure to any hazardous substance, which includes animal allergens, so far as reasonably practicable, for the protection of all people on the premises. This can be achieved in part by reviewing the risk of allergen exposure in specific areas of a facility and implementing appropriate infrastructure, environmental and performance controls to minimize that risk. The authors describe the approach used at their institution to stratify risk of allergen exposure in various areas of the animal facility and to implement appropriate controls. They also discuss their use of a monitoring program to evaluate allergen concentrations in low- and high-risk areas of the animal facility and explain how the monitoring results can be applied to determine which controls are needed to minimize risk of exposure and to provide a safe working environment.

Indexed as

AllergensAnimalsAnimals, LaboratoryFacility Regulation and ControlHumansOccupational ExposureOccupational HealthRisk AssessmentAllergens

Identifiers

PMID25526057
OpenAlexW2333381533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.