Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25525599›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2014

Quantification of an external motion surrogate for quality assurance in lung cancer radiation therapy.

Jens Wölfelschneider, Tobias Brandt, Sebastian Lettmaier, Rainer Fietkau, Christoph Bert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Gated Radiotherapy Development and its Expansion.Journal of biomedical physics & engineering · 2021
    Article
  2. Management of organ motion in scanned ion beam therapy.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2017
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jens WölfelschneiderUniversity Hospital Erlangen, Radiation Oncology, Universitätsstraße 27, 91054 Erlangen, Germany ; Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Faculty of Medicine, Krankenhausstraße 12, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1860-1467
Tobias BrandtUniversity Hospital Erlangen, Radiation Oncology, Universitätsstraße 27, 91054 Erlangen, Germany ; Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Faculty of Medicine, Krankenhausstraße 12, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8270-0144
Sebastian LettmaierUniversity Hospital Erlangen, Radiation Oncology, Universitätsstraße 27, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Rainer FietkauUniversity Hospital Erlangen, Radiation Oncology, Universitätsstraße 27, 91054 Erlangen, Germany ; Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Faculty of Medicine, Krankenhausstraße 12, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8295-7145
Christoph BertUniversity Hospital Erlangen, Radiation Oncology, Universitätsstraße 27, 91054 Erlangen, Germany ; Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Faculty of Medicine, Krankenhausstraße 12, 91054 Erlangen, Germany ; GSI-Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research, Department of Biophysics, Planckstraße 1, 64291 Darmstadt, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8539-6600

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this work was to validate the stability of the end exhale position in deep expiration breath hold (DEBH) technique for quality assurance in stereotactic lung tumor radiation therapy. Furthermore, a motion analysis was performed for 20 patients to evaluate breathing periods and baseline drifts based on an external surrogate. This trajectory was detected using stereo infrared (IR) cameras and reflective body markers. The respiratory waveform showed large interpatient differences in the end exhale position during irradiation up to 18.8 mm compared to the global minimum. This position depends significantly on the tumor volume. Also the baseline drifts, which occur mostly in posterior direction, are affected by the tumor size. Breathing periods, which depend mostly on the patient age, were in a range between 2.4 s and 7.0 s. Fifteen out of 20 patients, who showed a reproducible end exhale position with a deviation of less than 5 mm, might benefit from DEBH due to smaller planning target volumes (PTV) compared to free breathing irradiation and hence sparing of healthy tissue. Patients with larger uncertainties should be treated with more complex motion compensation techniques.

Indexed as

RadiosurgeryRespirationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCarcinoma, Non-Small-Cell LungExhalationFemaleHumansLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisQuality Assurance, Health Care

Identifiers

PMID25525599
PMCPMC4266763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.