Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25525410›Full record

ArticleBMC clinical pathology2014

Prognostic value of the MicroRNA regulators Dicer and Drosha in non-small-cell lung cancer: co-expression of Drosha and miR-126 predicts poor survival.

Kenneth Lønvik, Sveinung W Sørbye, Marit N Nilsen, Ruth H Paulssen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC clinical pathology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. APE1 controls DICER1 expression in NSCLC through miR-33a and miR-130b.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Induction Function of miR-126 in Survival and Proliferation in Neural Stem Cells.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2015
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Indian journal of medical and paediatric oncology : official journal of Indian Society of Medical & Paediatric Oncology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kenneth LønvikDepartment of Clinical Pathology, University Hospital of Northern Norway, N-9038 Tromsø, Norway ; Department of Medical Biology, Tromsø, Norway.
Sveinung W SørbyeDepartment of Clinical Pathology, University Hospital of Northern Norway, N-9038 Tromsø, Norway.
Marit N NilsenDepartment of Medical Biology, Tromsø, Norway.
Ruth H PaulssenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, UiT - The Arctic University of Norway, N-9037 Tromsø, Norway.
University Hospital of North Norway · NOUiT The Arctic University of Norway · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDicer and Drosha are important enzymes for processing microRNAs. Recent studies have exhibited possible links between expression of different miRNAs, levels of miRNA processing enzymes, and cancer prognosis. We have investigated the prognostic impact of Dicer and Drosha and their correlation with miR-126 expression in a large cohort of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. We aimed to find patient groups within the cohort that might have an advantage of receiving adjunctive therapies.

methodsDicer expression in the cytoplasm and Drosha expression in the nucleus were evaluated by manual immunohistochemistry of tissue microarrays (TMAs), including tumor tissue samples from 335 patients with resected stages I to IIIA NSCLC. In addition, in situ hybridizations of TMAs for visualization of miR-126 were performed. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed, and the log-rank test via SPSS v.22 was used for estimating significance levels.

resultsIn patients with normal performance status (ECOG = 0, n = 197), high Dicer expression entailed a significantly better prognosis than low Dicer expression (P = 0.024). Dicer had no significant prognostic value in patients with reduced performance status (ECOG = 1-2, n = 138). High Drosha expression was significantly correlated with high levels of the microRNA 126 (miR-126) (P = 0.004). Drosha/miR-126 co-expression had a significant negative impact on the disease-specific survival (DSS) rate (P < 0.001). Multivariate analyses revealed that the interaction Dicer*Histology (P = 0.049) and Drosha/miR-126 co-expression (P = 0.033) were independent prognostic factors.

conclusionsIn NSCLC patients with normal performance status, Dicer is a positive prognostic factor. The importance of Drosha as a prognostic factor in our material seems to be related to miR-126 and possibly other microRNAs.

Indexed as

DicerDroshaImmunohistochemistrymicroRNAmiR-126NSCLC

Identifiers

PMID25525410
PMCPMC4269969
OpenAlexW2140074413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.