Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25525099›Full record

ArticleJournal of insect science (Online)2014

Microarray analysis of tomato plants exposed to the nonviruliferous or viruliferous whitefly vector harboring Pepper golden mosaic virus.

Richard O Musser, Sue M Hum-Musser, Matthew Gallucci, Brittany DesRochers, Judith K Brown

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of insect science (Online), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Induced Systemic Resistance in thePlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  3. Recent Advances in Molecular Diagnostics of Fungal Plant Pathogens: A Mini Review.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Richard O MusserDepartment of Biological Sciences, Western Illinois University, Macomb, IL 61455 ro-musser@wiu.edu.
Sue M Hum-MusserDepartment of Biological Sciences, Western Illinois University, Macomb, IL 61455.
Matthew GallucciSchool of Plant Sciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721.
Brittany DesRochersDepartment of Biological Sciences, Western Illinois University, Macomb, IL 61455.
Judith K BrownSchool of Plant Sciences, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721.
Western Illinois University · USUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plants are routinely exposed to biotic and abiotic stresses to which they have evolved by synthesizing constitutive and induced defense compounds. Induced defense compounds are usually made, initially, at low levels; however, following further stimulation by specific kinds of biotic and abiotic stresses, they can be synthesized in relatively large amounts to abate the particular stress. cDNA microarray hybridization was used to identify an array of genes that were differentially expressed in tomato plants 15 d after they were exposed to feeding by nonviruliferous whiteflies or by viruliferous whiteflies carrying Pepper golden mosaic virus (PepGMV) (Begomovirus, Geminiviridae). Tomato plants inoculated by viruliferous whiteflies developed symptoms characteristic of PepGMV, whereas plants exposed to nonviruliferous whitefly feeding or nonwounded (negative) control plants exhibited no disease symptoms. The microarray analysis yielded over 290 spotted probes, with significantly altered expression of 161 putative annotated gene targets, and 129 spotted probes of unknown identities. The majority of the differentially regulated "known" genes were associated with the plants exposed to viruliferous compared with nonviruliferous whitefly feeding. Overall, significant differences in gene expression were represented by major physiological functions including defense-, pathogen-, photosynthesis-, and signaling-related responses and were similar to genes identified for other insect-plant systems. Viruliferous whitefly-stimulated gene expression was validated by real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction of selected, representative candidate genes (messenger RNA): arginase, dehydrin, pathogenesis-related proteins 1 and -4, polyphenol oxidase, and several protease inhibitors. This is the first comparative profiling of the expression of tomato plants portraying different responses to biotic stress induced by viruliferous whitefly feeding (with resultant virus infection) compared with whitefly feeding only and negative control nonwounded plants exposed to neither. These results may be applicable to many other plant-insect-pathogen system interactions.

Indexed as

AnimalsDNA, ComplementaryGeminiviridaeGene Expression ProfilingGenes, PlantHemipteraInsect VectorsMicroarray AnalysisPhotosynthesisPlant DiseasesPlant ProteinsReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, MessengerSignal TransductionSolanum lycopersicumStress, PhysiologicalDNA, ComplementaryPlant ProteinsRNA, MessengerbegomovirusBemisia tabacibiotic stressethyleneGeminiviridae

Identifiers

PMID25525099
PMCPMC5634132
OpenAlexW2048475520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.