Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25525051›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of infectious diseases2015

Randomized, controlled trial of high-dose influenza vaccine among frail residents of long-term care facilities.

David A Nace, Chyongchiou Jeng Lin, Ted M Ross, Stacey Saracco, Roberta M Churilla, Richard K Zimmerman

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01654224 (Randomized Trial of High Dose Influenza Vaccine in Long Term Care Setting), which is not on this map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01654224 phase4completednot on this map

Randomized Trial of High Dose Influenza Vaccine in Long Term Care Setting

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PittsburghRan2011 to 2014Enrolled205ConditionsInfluenzaArmsHigh Dose Inactivated Influenza Vaccine, Standard Dose Inactivated Influenza Vaccine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. [High-dose trivalent influenza vaccine. Efficacy and effectiveness].Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2020
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

David A NaceDivision of Geriatric Medicine.
Chyongchiou Jeng LinDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Ted M RossVaccine and Gene Therapy Institute of Florida, Port Saint Lucie.
Stacey SaraccoDivision of Geriatric Medicine.
Roberta M ChurillaDivision of Geriatric Medicine.
Richard K ZimmermanDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Funding

VARIABILITY, STABILITY & SMOOTHNESS OF WALKINGP30AG024827 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JENNIFER S BRACH · 2004 to 2026
$28.6M
Improving Outcomes of UTI in LTC Facilities: The IOU StudyR18HS023779 · AHRQ · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI NACE, DAVID A. · 2015 to 2017
$1.4M
AHRQ HHS R18 HS023779NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024827
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite vaccination, residents of long-term-care facilities (LTCFs) remain at high risk of influenza-related morbidity and mortality. More-effective vaccine options for this population are needed.

methodsWe conducted a single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial comparing high-dose (HD) to standard-dose (SD) inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV) in 205 frail, elderly residents of LTCFs during the 2011-2012 and 2012-2013 influenza seasons. Hemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibody titers were measured at baseline and 30 and 180 days following vaccination.

resultsA total of 187 subjects (91%) completed the study. The mean age was 86.7 years. Geometric mean titers (GMTs) were significantly higher (P < .05) at day 30 for HD recipients, compared with SD recipients, for all comparisons except influenza A(H1N1) during 2012-2013 (the HD formulation was noninferior to the SD formulation for influenza A[H1N1] during 2012-2013). GMTs for HD and SD recipients during 2011-2012 were as follows: influenza A(H1N1), 78 (95% confidence interval [CI], 45-136) and 27 (95% CI, 17-44), respectively; influenza A(H3N2), 26 (95% CI, 17-40) and 10 (95% CI, 7-15), respectively; and influenza B, 26 (95% CI, 19-35) and 14 (95% CI, 11-18), respectively. During 2012-2013, GMTs for HD and SD recipients were as follows: influenza A(H1N1), 46 (95% CI, 33-63) and 50 (95% CI, 37-67); influenza A(H3N2), 23 (95% CI, 18-31) and 14 (95% CI, 11-18), respectively; and influenza B, 26 (95% CI, 21-32) and 17 (95% CI, 14-22), respectively. GMTs were significantly higher at day 180 for HD recipients, compared with SD recipients, for influenza A(H3N2) in both years (P < .001).

conclusionsAmong frail, elderly residents of LTCFs, HD influenza vaccine produced superior responses for all strains except influenza A(H1N1) in 2012-2013. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01654224.

Indexed as

Frail ElderlyLong-Term CareAged, 80 and overAntibodies, ViralFemaleHemagglutination Inhibition TestsHumansInfluenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeInfluenza A Virus, H3N2 SubtypeInfluenza B virusInfluenza, HumanInfluenza VaccinesMaleSingle-Blind MethodAntibodies, ViralInfluenza Vaccineshigh-dose influenza vaccineinactivated influenza vaccinelong-term care

Identifiers

PMID25525051
PMCPMC4539906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.