ArticleProteins2015
Improving accuracy of protein contact prediction using balanced network deconvolution.
Article in Proteins, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Engineering Proteins Using Statistical Models of Coevolutionary Sequence Information.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2024Review
- In Silico Protein Folding Prediction of COVID-19 Mutations and Variants.Biomolecules · 2022Article
- Toward the solution of the protein structure prediction problem.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2021Review
- Deep learning techniques have significantly impacted protein structure prediction and protein design.Current opinion in structural biology · 2021Review
- Advances in Chromatin and Chromosome Research: Perspectives from Multiple Fields.Molecular cell · 2020Review
- Homology modeling in the time of collective and artificial intelligence.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020Review
- Assessing the accuracy of contact predictions in CASP13.Proteins · 2019Article
- ResPRE: high-accuracy protein contact prediction by coupling precision matrix with deep residual neural networks.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
- Predicting protein inter-residue contacts using composite likelihood maximization and deep learning.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- Assessment of contact predictions in CASP12: Co-evolution and deep learning coming of age.Proteins · 2018Article
- An overview of comparative modelling and resources dedicated to large-scale modelling of genome sequences.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2017Review
- Integration of QUARK and I-TASSER for Ab Initio Protein Structure Prediction in CASP11.Proteins · 2016Article
- Accurate disulfide-bonding network predictions improve ab initio structure prediction of cysteine-rich proteins.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Residue contact map is essential for protein three-dimensional structure determination. But most of the current contact prediction methods based on residue co-evolution suffer from high false-positives as introduced by indirect and transitive contacts (i.e., residues A-B and B-C are in contact, but A-C are not). Built on the work by Feizi et al. (Nat Biotechnol 2013; 31:726-733), which demonstrated a general network model to distinguish direct dependencies by network deconvolution, this study presents a new balanced network deconvolution (BND) algorithm to identify optimized dependency matrix without limit on the eigenvalue range in the applied network systems. The algorithm was used to filter contact predictions of five widely used co-evolution methods. On the test of proteins from three benchmark datasets of the 9th critical assessment of protein structure prediction (CASP9), CASP10, and PSICOV (precise structural contact prediction using sparse inverse covariance estimation) database experiments, the BND can improve the medium- and long-range contact predictions at the L/5 cutoff by 55.59% and 47.68%, respectively, without additional central processing unit cost. The improvement is statistically significant, with a P-value < 5.93 × 10(-3) in the Student's t-test. A further comparison with the ab initio structure predictions in CASPs showed that the usefulness of the current co-evolution-based contact prediction to the three-dimensional structure modeling relies on the number of homologous sequences existing in the sequence databases. BND can be used as a general contact refinement method, which is freely available at: http://www.csbio.sjtu.edu.cn/bioinf/BND/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.