Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25524367›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology resources2015

One species in eight: DNA barcodes from type specimens resolve a taxonomic quagmire.

Marko Mutanen, Mari Kekkonen, Sean W J Prosser, Paul D N Hebert, Lauri Kaila

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology resources, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Prospects for Complete DNA Barcode Coverage of the New Zealand Insect Fauna.Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · 2026
    Article
  3. On the identity of the type species ofAnnals of the Entomological Society of America · 2025
    Article
  4. Molecular characterization and phylogenetic relationships amongSaudi journal of biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Deciphering the Taxonomic Delimitation ofFrontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Reexamination ofBiodiversity data journal · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Marko MutanenBiodiversity Unit, Department of Biology, University of Oulu, P.O. Box 3000, FI-90014, Oulu, Finland.
Mari KekkonenZoology Unit, Finnish Museum of Natural History, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 17, FI-00014, Helsinki, Finland.
Sean W J ProsserBiodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Paul D N HebertBiodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Lauri KailaZoology Unit, Finnish Museum of Natural History, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 17, FI-00014, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Each holotype specimen provides the only objective link to a particular Linnean binomen. Sequence information from them is increasingly valuable due to the growing usage of DNA barcodes in taxonomy. As type specimens are often old, it may only be possible to recover fragmentary sequence information from them. We tested the efficacy of short sequences from type specimens in the resolution of a challenging taxonomic puzzle: the Elachista dispunctella complex which includes 64 described species with minuscule morphological differences. We applied a multistep procedure to resolve the taxonomy of this species complex. First, we sequenced a large number of newly collected specimens and as many holotypes as possible. Second, we used all >400 bp examine species boundaries. We employed three unsupervised methods (BIN, ABGD, GMYC) with specified criteria on how to handle discordant results and examined diagnostic bases from each delineated putative species (operational taxonomic units, OTUs). Third, we evaluated the morphological characters of each OTU. Finally, we associated short barcodes from types with the delineated OTUs. In this step, we employed various supervised methods, including distance-based, tree-based and character-based. We recovered 658 bp barcode sequences from 194 of 215 fresh specimens and recovered an average of 141 bp from 33 of 42 holotypes. We observed strong congruence among all methods and good correspondence with morphology. We demonstrate potential pitfalls with tree-, distance- and character-based approaches when associating sequences of varied length. Our results suggest that sequences as short as 56 bp can often provide valuable taxonomic information. The results support significant taxonomic oversplitting of species in the Elachista dispunctella complex.

Indexed as

AnimalsComputational BiologyDNADNA Barcoding, TaxonomicHaplotypesLepidopteraSequence Analysis, DNADNAAutomatic Barcode Gap DiscoveryBarcode Index NumberElachistaGMYCspecies delimitationspecies delineation

Identifiers

PMID25524367
PMCPMC4964951

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.