ArticleHeart and vessels2016
Clinical characteristics and intravascular ultrasound findings of culprit lesions in elderly patients with acute coronary syndrome.
Article in Heart and vessels, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The distribution of calcified nodule and plaque rupture in patients with peripheral artery disease: an intravascular ultrasound analysis.Heart and vessels · 2017Article
- Gender differences in plaque characteristics of culprit lesions in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction.Heart and vessels · 2016Observational
- Pulse Pressure and Upstroke Time Are Useful Parameters for the Diagnosis of Peripheral Artery Disease in Patients With Normal Ankle Brachial Index.Cardiology research · 2016Article
- Impact of spotty calcification on long-term prediction of future revascularization: a prospective three-vessel intravascular ultrasound study.Heart and vessels · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is one of the main causes of cardiovascular death. According to rapid aging of society, the peak age of ACS onset has grown older globally. Despite growing recognition of the necessity to build the ACS prevention strategy in the elderly, patients background and culprit lesion morphology of these elderly ACS patients have not been well studied. We sought to assess the clinical characteristics and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) findings of the culprit lesions in elderly ACS patients. One-hundred and fifty-eight consecutive ACS patients whose culprit lesions imaged by pre-intervention IVUS were divided into two groups based on the age of onset: elderly [E] group (≥75 years, n = 65) and non-elderly [NE] group (<75 years, n = 93). As compared with NE group, hemoglobin (12.7 ± 2.0 g/dL vs. 13.7 ± 1.6 g/dL, p = 0.001), estimated glomerular filtration rate (62.5 ± 22.5 mL/min/1.73 m(2) vs. 75.5 ± 20.5 mL/min/1.73 m(2), p = 0.0001), and body mass index (22.9 ± 3.4 kg/m(2) vs. 24.5 ± 3.4 kg/m(2), p = 0.003) were significantly lower, and comorbid malignancy was more common (20.0 vs 6.5 %, p = 0.01) in E group. Although whole culprit segment was not positively remodeled (mean vessel area was 15.2 ± 5.6 mm(3)/mm vs. 16.2 ± 5.1 mm(3)/mm, p = 0.16) in E group, at maximum external elastic membrane site of the culprit lesion, lumen area was smaller (5.5 ± 3.2 mm(2) vs. 6.7 ± 3.5 mm(2), p = 0.04), and plaque burden tended to be more abundant (70 ± 13 vs. 66 ± 13 %, p = 0.08). Interestingly, echo attenuation arc of culprit attenuated plaque was significantly greater in E group than in NE group (157 ± 83° vs. 118 ± 60°, p = 0.01). In conclusion, extracardiac comorbidity was more common in elderly ACS patients, and their culprit coronary lesions were still rupture prone, and "vulnerable."
Indexed as
Identifiers
25523892What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.