Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25523873›Full record

ArticlemAbs2015

Structural insights and biomedical potential of IgNAR scaffolds from sharks.

Stefan Zielonka, Martin Empting, Julius Grzeschik, Doreen Könning, Caroline J Barelle, Harald Kolmar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mAbs, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Characteristics and Genomic Localization of Nurse Shark (International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stefan Zielonkaa Institute for Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry ; Technische Universität Darmstadt ; Darmstadt , Germany.
Martin Empting
Julius Grzeschik
Doreen Könning
Caroline J Barelle
Harald Kolmar

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In addition to antibodies with the classical composition of heavy and light chains, the adaptive immune repertoire of sharks also includes a heavy-chain only isotype, where antigen binding is mediated exclusively by a small and highly stable domain, referred to as vNAR. In recent years, due to their high affinity and specificity combined with their small size, high physicochemical stability and low-cost of production, vNAR fragments have evolved as promising target-binding scaffolds that can be tailor-made for applications in medicine and biotechnology. This review highlights the structural features of vNAR molecules, addresses aspects of their generation using immunization or in vitro high throughput screening methods and provides examples of therapeutic, diagnostic and other biotechnological applications.

Indexed as

AnimalsFish ProteinsImmunoglobulin Heavy ChainsProtein Structure, SecondaryProtein Structure, TertiarySharksFish ProteinsImmunoglobulin Heavy Chainsantibody technologybiologic therapeuticCDR, complementarity-determining regionheavy chain antibodyHV, hypervariable regionIgNARIgNAR, immunoglobulin new antigen receptorIgNAR V domain, variable domain of IgNARmAbs, monoclonal antibodiesscFv, single chain variable fragmentsharksingle chain binding domainVHH, variable domain of camelid heavy chain antibodiesVH, variable domain of the heavy chainVL, variable domain of the light chainvNAR, variable domain of IgNAR

Identifiers

PMID25523873
PMCPMC4622739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.