ArticleCurrent microbiology2015
Effects of plant stress signal molecules on the production of wilforgine in an endophytic actinomycete isolated from Tripterygium wilfordii Hook.f.
Article in Current microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Regulating Gut Microbiome: Therapeutic Strategy for Rheumatoid Arthritis During Pregnancy and Lactation.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2020Review
- Community Structures and Antifungal Activity of Root-Associated Endophytic Actinobacteria of Healthy and Diseased Soybean.Microorganisms · 2019Article
- Community Composition and Metabolic Potential of Endophytic Actinobacteria From Coastal Salt Marsh Plants in Jiangsu, China.Frontiers in microbiology · 2019Article
- Recent advances in understandingF1000Research · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The endophytic actinomycete F4-20 was isolated from Tripterygium wilfordii Hook.f. and was confirmed to produce wilforgine, a secondary metabolite discovered in its host. F4-20 showed a close phylogenetic relationship to Streptomyces species. To seek elicitors that may enhance the production of wilforgine in F4-20, four plant stress molecules were applied to the in vitro liquid cultures. Results showed that methyl jasmonate (MeJA), salicylic acid (SA), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) inhibited bacterial growth, whereas glutathione (GSH) treatment significantly increased bacterial growth. The wilforgine contents in the mycelia of F4-20 were reduced by MeJA and GSH but were induced by SA and H2O2. When added in the end of the culture period (7 day), 1 mM SA and 5 mM H2O2 resulted in 69.35 ± 1.71 and 71.80 ± 3.35 µg/g DW of wilforgine production, 1.55 and 1.60 fold to that of control (44.83 ± 1.35 µg/g DW), respectively. Though this improved production was about 6.5 times lower than that of the natural root (454.00 µg/g dry root bark), it provided an alternative method for the production of valuable plant secondary metabolites.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.