Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25523361›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2016

Does sharing the electronic health record in the consultation enhance patient involvement? A mixed-methods study using multichannel video recording and in-depth interviews in primary care.

Heather Milne, Guro Huby, Susan Buckingham, James Hayward, Aziz Sheikh, Kathrin Cresswell, Hilary Pinnock

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Patient views on asthma diagnosis and how a clinical decision support system could help: A qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Juggling confidentiality and safety: a qualitative study of how general practice clinicians document domestic violence in families with children.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017
    Article
  8. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Heather MilneeHealth Research Group, Centre for Population Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Guro HubyFaculty of Health and Social Studies, University College Østfold and School of Health in Social Science, Edinburgh, UK.
Susan BuckinghameHealth Research Group, Centre for Population Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
James HaywardCentre for Population Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Aziz SheikhCentre for Population Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Kathrin CresswellCentre for Population Health Sciences, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Hilary PinnockAllergy and Respiratory Group, Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSharing the electronic health-care record (EHR) during consultations has the potential to facilitate patient involvement in their health care, but research about this practice is limited.

methodsWe used multichannel video recordings to identify examples and examine the practice of screen-sharing within 114 primary care consultations. A subset of 16 consultations was viewed by the general practitioner and/or patient in 26 reflexive interviews. Screen-sharing emerged as a significant theme and was explored further in seven additional patient interviews. Final analysis involved refining themes from interviews and observation of videos to understand how screen-sharing occurred, and its significance to patients and professionals.

resultsEighteen (16%) of 114 videoed consultations involved instances of screen-sharing. Screen-sharing occurred in six of the subset of 16 consultations with interviews and was a significant theme in 19 of 26 interviews. The screen was shared in three ways: 'convincing' the patient of a diagnosis or treatment; 'translating' between medical and lay understandings of disease/medication; and by patients 'verifying' the accuracy of the EHR. However, patients and most GPs perceived the screen as the doctor's domain, not to be routinely viewed by the patient.

conclusionsScreen-sharing can facilitate patient involvement in the consultation, depending on the way in which sharing comes about, but the perception that the record belongs to the doctor is a barrier. To exploit the potential of sharing the screen to promote patient involvement, there is a need to reconceptualise and redesign the EHR.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsPhysician-Patient RelationsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCommunicationComputer PeripheralsFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPatient ParticipationPrimary Health CareVictoriaVideo Recordingconsultation skillselectronic health recordinformation technologypatient involvementprimary care

Identifiers

PMID25523361
PMCPMC5055250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.