ArticleBMC cancer2014
Intratumoral heterogeneity in a minority of ovarian low-grade serous carcinomas.
Article in BMC cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evolutionary perspectives, heterogeneity and ovarian cancer: a complicated tale from past to present.Journal of ovarian research · 2022Pooled it
- Eosinophilic Cells in Ovarian Borderline Serous Tumors as a Predictor of BRAF Mutation.Cancers · 2024Article
- Low-grade serous ovarian cancer: expert consensus report on the state of the science.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2023Article
- In pursuit of sensitivity: Lessons learned from viral nucleic acid detection and quantification on the Raindance ddPCR platform.Methods (San Diego, Calif.) · 2022Review
- Aberrant MAPK Signaling Offers Therapeutic Potential for Treatment of Ovarian Carcinoma.OncoTargets and therapy · 2022Review
- Case Report: A NovelFrontiers in genetics · 2022Article
- Cell-Free DNA for the Management of Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- SMAD-6, -7 and -9 are potential molecular biomarkers for the prognosis in human lung cancer.Oncology letters · 2020Article
- Mutation allele frequency threshold does not affect prognostic analysis using next-generation sequencing in oral squamous cell carcinoma.BMC cancer · 2018Article
- Characteristics and outcome of the COEUR Canadian validation cohort for ovarian cancer biomarkers.BMC cancer · 2018Article
- miR-9 functions as a tumor inhibitor of cell proliferation in epithelial ovarian cancer through targeting the SDF-1/CXCR4 pathway.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2017Article
- Ovarian cancer.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2016Review
- Routine clinical mutation profiling using next generation sequencing and a customized gene panel improves diagnostic precision in myeloid neoplasms.Oncotarget · 2016Review
- KRAS G12V Mutation Detection by Droplet Digital PCR in Circulating Cell-Free DNA of Colorectal Cancer Patients.International journal of molecular sciences · 2016Article
- Differences in MEK inhibitor efficacy in molecularly characterized low-grade serous ovarian cancer cell lines.American journal of cancer research · 2016Article
- Integrated genomic analysis suggests MLL3 is a novel candidate susceptibility gene for familial nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundOvarian low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC) has fewer mutations than ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) and a less aggressive clinical course. However, an overwhelming majority of LGSC patients do not respond to conventional chemotherapy resulting in a poor long-term prognosis comparable to women diagnosed with HGSC. KRAS and BRAF mutations are common in LGSC, leading to clinical trials targeting the MAPK pathway. We assessed the stability of targetable somatic mutations over space and/or time in LGSC, with a view to inform stratified treatment strategies and clinical trial design.
methodsEleven LGSC cases with primary and recurrent paired samples were identified (stage IIB-IV). Tumor DNA was isolated from 1-4 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor blocks from both the primary and recurrence (n = 37 tumor and n = 7 normal samples). Mutational analysis was performed using the Ion Torrent AmpliSeqTM Cancer Panel, with targeted validation using Fluidigm-MiSeq, Sanger sequencing and/or Raindance Raindrop digital PCR.
resultsKRAS (3/11), BRAF (2/11) and/or NRAS (1/11) mutations were identified in five unique cases. A novel, non-synonymous mutation in SMAD4 was observed in one case. No somatic mutations were detected in the remaining six cases. In two cases with a single matched primary and recurrent sample, two KRAS hotspot mutations (G12V, G12R) were both stable over time. In three cases with multiple samplings from both the primary and recurrent surgery some mutations (NRAS Q61R, BRAF V600E, SMAD4 R361G) were stable across all samples, while others (KRAS G12V, BRAF G469V) were unstable.
conclusionsOverall, the majority of cases with detectable somatic mutations showed mutational stability over space and time while one of five cases showed both temporal and spatial mutational instability in presumed drivers of disease. Investigation of additional cases is required to confirm whether mutational heterogeneity in a minority of LGSC is a general phenomenon that should be factored into the design of clinical trials and stratified treatment for this patient population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.