Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25523241›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2014

A qualitative description of telemedicine for acute stroke care in Norway: technology is not the issue.

Tove Sørensen, Kari Dyb, Ellen Rygh, Rolf Salvesen, Lars Thomassen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tove SørensenNorwegian Centre for Integrated Care and Telemedicine, PO Box 35, NO-9038, Tromsø, Norway. tove.sorensen@telemed.no.
Kari DybNorwegian Centre for Integrated Care and Telemedicine, PO Box 35, NO-9038, Tromsø, Norway. kari.dyb@telemed.no.
Ellen RyghNorwegian Centre for Integrated Care and Telemedicine, Kirkeveien 9, NO-4816, Kolbjørnsvik, Norway. ellen.rygh@telemed.no.
Rolf SalvesenNordland Hospital, NO-8092, Bodø, Norway. rolf.salvesen@nlsh.no.
Lars ThomassenHaukeland University Hospital, NO-5021, Bergen, Norway. lars.thomassen@helse-bergen.no.
University Hospital of North Norway · NOHaukeland University Hospital · NONordland Hospital · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo assist small hospitals in providing advanced stroke treatment, the Norwegian Directorate of Health has recommended telemedicine services. Telestroke enables specialists to examine patients via videoconferencing supplemented by teleradiology and to provide decision support to local health care personnel. There is evidence that telestroke increases thrombolysis rates. In Norway, telemedicine has mainly been used in non-critical situations. The first telestroke trials took place in 2008. The aim of this paper is to present an overview of telestroke trials and today's status with telestroke in Norway. Based on the divergent experience from two health regions in Norway, the paper discusses crucial factors for the integration of telestroke in clinical practice.

methodsThis is a descriptive study based on multiple methods to obtain an overview of the practice and experience with telestroke in Norway. A Web and literature search for 'telestroke in Norway' was performed and compared with a survey of telemedicine services at the country's largest hospitals. These findings were supplemented by interviews with key personnel involved in telestroke in two of four health regions, as well as hospital field observations and log data of telestroke transmissions from five of the hospitals involved.

resultsIn Norway, experience in telemedicine for acute stroke care is limited. At the beginning of 2014, three of four regional health authorities were working with telestroke projects and services. Integration of the service in practice is challenging, with varying experience. The problems are not attributed to the technology in itself, but to organization (availability of staff on duty 24/7 and surveillance of the systems), motivation of staff, logistics (patient delay), and characteristics of the buildings (lack of space).

conclusionsPrerequisites for successful integration of telestroke in clinical practice include realization of the collaboration potential in the technology with consistent procedures for training and triage, availability of the equipment, and providing advice beyond questions concerning thrombolysis.

Indexed as

StrokeAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overComputer SystemsCritical CareHospitalsHumansInterviews as TopicMiddle AgedNorwayQualitative ResearchTelemedicineTeleradiologyVideoconferencing

Identifiers

PMID25523241
PMCPMC4276053
OpenAlexW2105492325

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.