Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25523056›Full record

ArticleStroke2015

Persistent cerebrovascular damage after stroke in type two diabetic rats measured by magnetic resonance imaging.

Guangliang Ding, Tao Yan, Jieli Chen, Michael Chopp, Lian Li, Qingjiang Li, Chengcheng Cui, Ruizhuo Ning, Quan Jiang

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stroke, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. White matter changes after stroke in type 2 diabetic rats measured by diffusion magnetic resonance imaging.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Guangliang DingFrom the Department of Neurology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI (G.D., T.Y., J.C., M.C., L.L., Q.L., C.C., R.N., Q.J.); and Department of Physics, Oakland University, Rochester, MI (M.C.).
Tao YanFrom the Department of Neurology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI (G.D., T.Y., J.C., M.C., L.L., Q.L., C.C., R.N., Q.J.); and Department of Physics, Oakland University, Rochester, MI (M.C.).
Jieli ChenFrom the Department of Neurology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI (G.D., T.Y., J.C., M.C., L.L., Q.L., C.C., R.N., Q.J.); and Department of Physics, Oakland University, Rochester, MI (M.C.).
Michael ChoppFrom the Department of Neurology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI (G.D., T.Y., J.C., M.C., L.L., Q.L., C.C., R.N., Q.J.); and Department of Physics, Oakland University, Rochester, MI (M.C.).
Lian LiFrom the Department of Neurology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI (G.D., T.Y., J.C., M.C., L.L., Q.L., C.C., R.N., Q.J.); and Department of Physics, Oakland University, Rochester, MI (M.C.).
Qingjiang LiFrom the Department of Neurology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI (G.D., T.Y., J.C., M.C., L.L., Q.L., C.C., R.N., Q.J.); and Department of Physics, Oakland University, Rochester, MI (M.C.).
Chengcheng CuiFrom the Department of Neurology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI (G.D., T.Y., J.C., M.C., L.L., Q.L., C.C., R.N., Q.J.); and Department of Physics, Oakland University, Rochester, MI (M.C.).
Ruizhuo NingFrom the Department of Neurology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI (G.D., T.Y., J.C., M.C., L.L., Q.L., C.C., R.N., Q.J.); and Department of Physics, Oakland University, Rochester, MI (M.C.).
Quan JiangFrom the Department of Neurology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI (G.D., T.Y., J.C., M.C., L.L., Q.L., C.C., R.N., Q.J.); and Department of Physics, Oakland University, Rochester, MI (M.C.). qjiang1@hfhs.org.
Oakland University · US

Funding

Neurorestorative therapy of stroke with HUCBC in type two diabetic miceR01NS083078 · NINDS · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI CHEN, JIELI · 2014 to 2018
$1.6M
MSCs Induce Brain Plasticity via tPAR01AG037506 · NIA · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI CHOPP, MICHAEL · 2011 to 2015
$1.5M
Imaging Cell Based Treatment of Traumatic Brain InjuryR01NS064134 · NINDS · HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM · PI JIANG, QUAN · 2011 to 2014
$1.3M
Neurorestorative therapy of stroke with HUCBC in T2DM ratsR41NS080329 · NINDS · SANERON CCEL THERAPEUTICS, INC. · PI CHEN, JIELI · 2013 to 2014
$423k
NIA NIH HHS AG037506NIA NIH HHS R01 AG037506NINDS NIH HHS NS064134NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS064134NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS083078NINDS NIH HHS R41 NS080329PHS HHS R41 S080329
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeDiabetes mellitus is a disease with vascular components. Consequently, the blood-brain barrier disruption after stroke may differ between diabetic and nondiabetic animals. However, few studies have documented the longitudinal blood-brain barrier disruption afte stroke in diabetic animals. In this study, using MRI, we noninvasively evaluated the blood-brain barrier damage after middle cerebral artery occlusion in diabetic and nondiabetic rats.

methodsType 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) was induced in adult male Wistar rats by administration of a high-fat diet in combination with a single intraperitoneal injection (35 mg/kg) of streptozotocin. T2DM rats (n=9) and nondiabetic wild-type (WT) rats (n=9) were subjected to middle cerebral artery occlusion for 2 hours using the filament model. MRI was performed 1 day and then weekly for 5 weeks after middle cerebral artery occlusion for all rats.

resultsThe ischemic lesion volumes after stroke as measured using T2 maps were not significantly different between the T2DM and WT rats. Compared with the WT rats, the volumes of blood-brain barrier disruption evaluated using contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging with gadolinium-diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid and the cerebral hemorrhagic volumes measured with susceptibility-weighted imaging were significantly (P<0.05) larger in the T2DM rats from 1 to 5 weeks after stroke; values of diffusion fractional anisotropy were significantly lower in T2DM rats (P<0.03) than in WT rats after stroke. These MRI measurements were consistent with histological data.

conclusionsUsing MRI, T2-weighted imaging did not detect significant differences of the ischemic lesion volumes between T2DM and WT rats. In contrast to the WT rats, however, contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging and susceptibility-weighted imaging identified much more severe ischemic vascular damage, whereas fractional anisotropy demonstrated lower axonal density in the T2DM rats after stroke.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAnimalsCerebrovascular DisordersDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2MaleRatsRats, WistarStrokeblood–brain barrierdiabetes mellitushemorrhagemagnetic resonance imagingratsstroke

Identifiers

PMID25523056
PMCPMC4308544
OpenAlexW2050772538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.