ArticleBMC cancer2014
Incidence of breast and gynaecological cancers by ethnic group in England, 2001-2007: a descriptive study.
Article in BMC cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adapting the BOADICEA breast and ovarian cancer risk models for the ethnically diverse UK population.British journal of cancer · 2025Article
- A systematic review of endometrial cancer clinical research in Africa.Infectious agents and cancer · 2024Review
- Adherence to adjuvant endocrine therapy among White British and ethnic minority breast cancer survivors in the United Kingdom.European journal of cancer care · 2022Observational
- Considerations for multimodal prehabilitation in women with gynaecological cancers: a scoping review using realist principles.BMC women's health · 2022Article
- Disparities in access to mobile devices and e-health literacy among breast cancer survivors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022Article
- Comparing Characteristics of Endometrial Cancer in Women of South Asian and White Ethnicity in England.Cancers · 2021Article
- Article
- Genomics and splicing events of type II endometrial cancers in the black population: racial disparity, socioeconomic and geographical differences.American journal of cancer research · 2020Review
- Differences in the molecular profile of endometrial cancers from British White and British South Asian women.PloS one · 2020Article
- Genome-wide association studies identify susceptibility loci for epithelial ovarian cancer in east Asian women.Gynecologic oncology · 2019Article
- Childhood cancer incidence by ethnic group in England, 2001-2007: a descriptive epidemiological study.BMC cancer · 2017Article
- Incidence of prostate and urological cancers in England by ethnic group, 2001-2007: a descriptive study.BMC cancer · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough international comparisons reveal large geographical differences in the incidence of breast and gynaecological cancers, incidence data for ethnic groups in England remains scarce.
methodsWe compared the incidence of breast, ovarian, cervical and endometrial cancer in British Indians, Pakistanis, Bangladeshis, Black Africans, Black Caribbeans, Chinese and Whites between 2001 and 2007. We identified 357,476 cancer registrations from which incidence rates were calculated using mid-year population estimates from 2001 to 2007. Ethnicity was obtained through linkage to the Hospital Episodes Statistics database. Incidence rate ratios were calculated, comparing the 6 non-White ethnic groups to Whites, and were adjusted for age and income.
resultsWe found evidence of differences in the incidence of all 4 cancers by ethnic group (p<0.001). Relative to Whites, South Asians had much lower rates of breast, ovarian and cervical cancer (IRRs of 0.68, 0.66 and 0.33 respectively), Blacks had lower rates of breast, ovarian and cervical cancer but higher rates of endometrial cancer (IRRs of 0.85, 0.62, 0.72 and 1.16 respectively), and Chinese had lower rates of breast and cervical cancer (IRRs of 0.72 and 0.68 respectively). There were also substantial intra-ethnic differences, particularly among South Asians, with Bangladeshis experiencing the lowest rates of all 4 cancers.
conclusionsOur study provides evidence that the risk of breast and gynaecological cancers varies by ethnic group and that those groups typically grouped together are not homogenous with regards to their cancer risk. Furthermore, several of our findings cannot be readily explained by known risk factors and therefore warrant further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.