Trial reportPharmaceutical research2015
Physiology-based pharmacokinetics of caspofungin for adults and paediatrics.
Trial report in Pharmaceutical research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Development and Quality Control of a Population Pharmacokinetic Model Library for Caspofungin.Pharmaceutics · 2024Article
- Recent Progress on Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Model: A Review Based on Bibliometrics.Toxics · 2024Review
- Extended Dosing Regimens for Fungal Prophylaxis.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2019Review
- Whole-body physiology-based pharmacokinetics of caspofungin for general patients, intensive care unit patients and hepatic insufficiency patients.Acta pharmacologica Sinica · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeCaspofungin (CAS) is an antifungal agent for intravenous application in adults and children. Our aim was the development and validation of a physiology-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model in order to predict the pharmacokinetics in different patient populations, particularly in paediatrics.
methodsA PBPK model for adults was built and validated with raw data of the two clinical trials CASLAMB and CASMTD. Afterwards, the model was scaled for paediatric patients under the consideration of known biochemical differences between adults and paediatrics.
resultsThe simulated results of the PBPK model were in good agreement with the observed values of the CASLAMB and CASMTD trial. Patients of the CASLAMB trial received CAS in combination with cyclosporine A (CsA), which leads to an increased AUC0-24h of CAS hypothetically due to an inhibition of the hepatic transport protein OATP1B1 by CsA. However, there was no difference in the transport rate of OATP1B1 between CASLAMB and CASMTD patients in the PBPK model, suggesting that CsA might not influence OATP1B1. Furthermore, the model was able to sufficiently predict the pharmacokinetics of paediatric patients compared to published data.
conclusionThe final PBPK model of CAS without individualized parameter is able to predict the pharmacokinetics in different patient populations correctly. Thus, the model provides a basis for investigators to choose doses and sampling times for special populations such as infants and small children.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.