Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25522772›Full record

ArticleEvolution; international journal of organic evolution2015

A comparative analysis of island floras challenges taxonomy-based biogeographical models of speciation.

Javier Igea, Diego Bogarín, Alexander S T Papadopulos, Vincent Savolainen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evolution; international journal of organic evolution, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Genomics of plant speciation.Plant communications · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Within-island diversification in a passerine bird.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  7. Searching for Sympatric Speciation in the Genomic Era.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2019
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Union of phylogeography and landscape genetics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Javier IgeaDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot, SL5 7PY, United Kingdom.
Diego Bogarín
Alexander S T Papadopulos
Vincent Savolainen

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Speciation on islands, and particularly the divergence of species in situ, has long been debated. Here, we present one of the first, complete assessments of the geographic modes of speciation for the flora of a small oceanic island. Cocos Island (Costa Rica) is pristine; it is located 550 km off the Pacific coast of Central America. It harbors 189 native plant species, 33 of which are endemic. Using phylogenetic data from insular and mainland congeneric species, we show that all of the endemic species are derived from independent colonization events rather than in situ speciation. This is in sharp contrast to the results of a study carried out in a comparable system, Lord Howe Island (Australia), where as much as 8.2% of the plant species were the product of sympatric speciation. Differences in physiography and age between the islands may be responsible for the contrasting patterns of speciation observed. Importantly, comparing phylogenetic assessments of the modes of speciation with taxonomy-based measures shows that widely used island biogeography approaches overestimate rates of in situ speciation.

Indexed as

Genetic SpeciationPhylogeographyCosta RicaGenetic MarkersIslandsMolecular Sequence DataPhylogenyPlantsGenetic MarkersCladogenesisCocos Islandphylogenysympatric speciation

Identifiers

PMID25522772
PMCPMC6681140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.