Trial reportThe international journal of neuropsychopharmacology2014
Evaluation of the individual safe correction of antipsychotic agent polypharmacy in Japanese patients with chronic schizophrenia: validation of safe corrections for antipsychotic polypharmacy and the high-dose method.
Trial report in The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Risk Factors for Psychotic Relapse After Dose Reduction or Discontinuation of Antipsychotics in Patients With Chronic Schizophrenia. A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2023Pooled it
- Antipsychotic dose reduction compared to dose continuation for people with schizophrenia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Antipsychotic polypharmacy reduction versus polypharmacy continuation for people with schizophrenia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Factors associated with successful antipsychotic dose reduction in schizophrenia: a systematic review of prospective clinical trials and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2020Pooled it
- Optimization of Antipsychotic and Benzodiazepine Drugs in Patients with Severe Mental Disorders in an Intensive Case Management Program.Community mental health journal · 2019Pooled it
- Antipsychotic combinations for schizophrenia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Halved Dose of Antipsychotics Versus High-Dose Antipsychotic Therapy for Relapse in Patients with Schizophrenia Receiving High-Dose Antipsychotic Therapy: A Randomized Single-Blind Trial.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Trial
- Time-dependent effect of antipsychotic discontinuation and dose reduction on social functioning and subjective quality of life-a multilevel meta-analysis.EClinicalMedicine · 2023Article
- Polypharmacy Management of Antipsychotics in Patients with Schizophrenia.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Review
- Factors associated with health-related quality of life in long-stay inpatients with chronic schizophrenia.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2022Article
- Review: Influence of the CYP450 Genetic Variation on the Treatment of Psychotic Disorders.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Polypharmacy Management in the Older Adults: A Scoping Review of Available Interventions.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
- Should Antipsychotic Polypharmacy Be Used for Patients with Schizophrenia and Related Psychoses?The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy · 2021Article
- Application of a Pharmacogenetics-Based Precision Medicine Model (5SPM) to Psychotic Patients That Presented Poor Response to Neuroleptic Therapy.Journal of personalized medicine · 2020Article
- Effectiveness in Switching from Antipsychotic Polypharmacy to Monotherapy in Patients with Schizophrenia: A Case Series.Clinical psychopharmacology and neuroscience : the official scientific journal of the Korean College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2020Article
- Antipsychotic Polypharmacy: A Dirty Little Secret or a Fashion?The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2020Review
- Use of a Spin Strategy Can Result in Unreliable Research Findings.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2017Article
- Response to Dr. Okumura.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPolypharmacy for schizophrenia treatment is not justified by the available clinical evidence. We evaluated a treatment reduction approach that reduces the dose and number of antipsychotic medications simultaneously prescribed to patients.
methodsIn a randomized open study of the Safe Correction of Antipsychotic Polypharmacy and High-Dose Prescriptions program funded by the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare, we evaluated a drug reduction method consisting of a dose reduction intervention performed on 163 patients with schizophrenia for twelve or 24 weeks. One antipsychotic medication was removed each week from each patient's treatment regimen by reducing the dose by 0 to 50 chlorpromazine equivalents. Data on health-related indices of quality of life, clinical symptoms, and risk of side effects were analyzed using a two-way repeated-measures mixed linear model.
resultsDespite a 23% reduction in antipsychotic dose, no differences in outcomes were observed between the dose reduction and observation groups (effect size = 0.001 - 0.085, P = .24-.97), despite high statistical power (1-β = 0.48-0.97). The findings are limited by the nonuniformity of the participants' treatment history, duration, and dose reduction amount. Dose reduction protocol patients exhibited no difference in psychotic symptoms or adverse events compared with the observation group.
conclusionsImportantly, the low dropout rate in our study (6.9% of participants withdrew because of patient factors and 23.8% for all secondary reasons) indicates that our "slowly" method is well tolerated. We hope that this approach will result in therapeutic improvements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.