Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25522175›Full record

Observational studyAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine2015

Lung cancer in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Development and validation of the COPD Lung Cancer Screening Score.

Juan P de-Torres, David O Wilson, Pablo Sanchez-Salcedo, Joel L Weissfeld, Juan Berto, Arantzazu Campo, Ana B Alcaide, Marta García-Granero, Bartolome R Celli, Javier J Zulueta

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Recommendations from the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS) regarding computed tomography screening for lung cancer in Europe.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2017
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Prospective COPD Case Finding in a Lung Cancer Screening Program: A Pilot Study.Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Emphysema and lung cancer risk.Translational lung cancer research · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Complex Relationship between Bronchiectasis and Lung Cancer.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2022
    Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Juan P de-Torres1 Pulmonary Department and.
David O Wilson
Pablo Sanchez-Salcedo
Joel L Weissfeld
Juan Berto
Arantzazu Campo
Ana B Alcaide
Marta García-Granero
Bartolome R Celli
Javier J Zulueta

Funding

Vitamin D3 Modulation of Inflammation and Lung Cancer RiskP50CA090440 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI DACIC, SANJA · 2001 to 2015
$34.6M
Peripheral Markers of Phenotypic Heterogeneity in COPDP50HL084948 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI SCIURBA, FRANK · 2007 to 2012
$12.8M
NCI NIH HHS P50 CA090440NCI NIH HHS P50-CA90440NHLBI NIH HHS 1P50 HL084948NHLBI NIH HHS P50 HL084948
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationalePatients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are at high risk for lung cancer (LC) and represent a potential target to improve the diagnostic yield of screening programs.

objectivesTo develop a predictive score for LC risk for patients with COPD.

methodsThe Pamplona International Early Lung Cancer Detection Program (P-IELCAP) and the Pittsburgh Lung Screening Study (PLuSS) databases were analyzed. Only patients with COPD on spirometry were included. By logistic regression we determined which factors were independently associated with LC in PLuSS and developed a COPD LC screening score (COPD-LUCSS) to be validated in P-IELCAP. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsBy regression analysis, age greater than 60, body mass index less than 25 kg/m(2), pack-years history greater than 60, and emphysema presence were independently associated with LC diagnosis and integrated into the COPD-LUCSS, which ranges from 0 to 10 points. Two COPD-LUCSS risk categories were proposed: low risk (scores 0-6) and high risk (scores 7-10). In comparison with low-risk patients, in both cohorts LC risk increased 3.5-fold in the high-risk category.

conclusionsThe COPD-LUCSS is a good predictor of LC risk in patients with COPD participating in LC screening programs. Validation in two different populations adds strength to the findings.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAge DistributionEarly Detection of CancerEuropeFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLung NeoplasmsMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsProportional Hazards ModelsPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveCOPDlung cancerscreening

Identifiers

PMID25522175
PMCPMC4351574

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.