Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25521792›Full record

ArticleNature protocols2015

An improved toolbox to unravel the plant cellular machinery by tandem affinity purification of Arabidopsis protein complexes.

Jelle Van Leene, Dominique Eeckhout, Bernard Cannoot, Nancy De Winne, Geert Persiau, Eveline Van De Slijke, Leen Vercruysse, Maarten Dedecker, Aurine Verkest, Klaas Vandepoele and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature protocols, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed, 167 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Determining Macromolecular Structures Using Cryo-Electron Microscopy.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jelle Van Leene1] Department of Plant Systems Biology, Vlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie (VIB), Ghent, Belgium. [2] Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Dominique Eeckhout1] Department of Plant Systems Biology, Vlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie (VIB), Ghent, Belgium. [2] Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Bernard Cannoot1] Department of Plant Systems Biology, Vlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie (VIB), Ghent, Belgium. [2] Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Nancy De Winne1] Department of Plant Systems Biology, Vlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie (VIB), Ghent, Belgium. [2] Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Geert Persiau1] Department of Plant Systems Biology, Vlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie (VIB), Ghent, Belgium. [2] Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Eveline Van De Slijke1] Department of Plant Systems Biology, Vlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie (VIB), Ghent, Belgium. [2] Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Leen Vercruysse1] Department of Plant Systems Biology, Vlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie (VIB), Ghent, Belgium. [2] Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Maarten Dedecker1] Department of Plant Systems Biology, Vlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie (VIB), Ghent, Belgium. [2] Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Aurine Verkest1] Department of Plant Systems Biology, Vlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie (VIB), Ghent, Belgium. [2] Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Klaas Vandepoele1] Department of Plant Systems Biology, Vlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie (VIB), Ghent, Belgium. [2] Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000000347902725
Lennart Martens1] Department of Medical Protein Research, VIB, Ghent, Belgium. [2] Department of Biochemistry, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Erwin WittersCentre for Proteome Analysis &Mass Spectrometry (CeProMa), University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Kris Gevaert1] Department of Medical Protein Research, VIB, Ghent, Belgium. [2] Department of Biochemistry, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Geert De Jaeger1] Department of Plant Systems Biology, Vlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie (VIB), Ghent, Belgium. [2] Department of Plant Biotechnology and Bioinformatics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Vlaams Instituut voor Biotechnologie · BEUniversity College Ghent · BEUniversity of Antwerp · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tandem affinity purification coupled to mass spectrometry (TAP-MS) is one of the most advanced methods to characterize protein complexes in plants, giving a comprehensive view on the protein-protein interactions (PPIs) of a certain protein of interest (bait). The bait protein is fused to a double affinity tag, which consists of a protein G tag and a streptavidin-binding peptide separated by a very specific protease cleavage site, allowing highly specific protein complex isolation under near-physiological conditions. Implementation of this optimized TAP tag, combined with ultrasensitive MS, means that these experiments can be performed on small amounts (25 mg of total protein) of protein extracts from Arabidopsis cell suspension cultures. It is also possible to use this approach to isolate low abundant protein complexes from Arabidopsis seedlings, thus opening perspectives for the exploration of protein complexes in a plant developmental context. Next to protocols for efficient biomass generation of seedlings (∼7.5 months), we provide detailed protocols for TAP (1 d), and for sample preparation and liquid chromatography-tandem MS (LC-MS/MS; ∼5 d), either from Arabidopsis seedlings or from cell cultures. For the identification of specific co-purifying proteins, we use an extended protein database and filter against a list of nonspecific proteins on the basis of the occurrence of a co-purified protein among 543 TAP experiments. The value of the provided protocols is illustrated through numerous applications described in recent literature.

Indexed as

Affinity LabelsArabidopsisCarrier ProteinsChromatography, LiquidImmunoglobulin GMultiprotein ComplexesProtein Interaction MapsSeedlingsTandem Mass SpectrometryAffinity LabelsCarrier ProteinsImmunoglobulin GMultiprotein Complexes

Identifiers

PMID25521792
OpenAlexW2030593666

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.