Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25521595›Full record

ArticleAnalytical chemistry2015

Evaluating multiplexed quantitative phosphopeptide analysis on a hybrid quadrupole mass filter/linear ion trap/orbitrap mass spectrometer.

Brian K Erickson, Mark P Jedrychowski, Graeme C McAlister, Robert A Everley, Ryan Kunz, Steven P Gygi

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical chemistry, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 97 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
97citing papers in PubMed
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

97 citing papers in PubMed, 166 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Assessing the Phagosome Proteome by Quantitative Mass Spectrometry.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023
    Article
  20. Article

37 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Brian K EricksonHarvard Medical School , Department of Cell Biology, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, United States.
Mark P Jedrychowski
Graeme C McAlister
Robert A Everley
Ryan Kunz
Steven P Gygi
Harvard University · US

Funding

New Sample Multiplexing Technologies to Identify Chemical Probes and Illuminate Ubiquitin BiologyR01GM067945 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI GYGI, STEVEN P · 2003 to 2024
$10.5M
Systems Analysis of cell type differentiation in Xenopus developmentR01HD073104 · NICHD · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI KIRSCHNER, MARC WALLACE, PESHKIN, LEON · 2012 to 2022
$6.7M
Cell Cycle proteomicsin XenopusR01GM103785 · NIGMS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI KIRSCHNER, MARC WALLACE · 2012 to 2016
$2.2M
NICHD NIH HHS HD073104NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD073104NIGMS NIH HHS GM103785NIGMS NIH HHS GM67945NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM067945
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As a driver for many biological processes, phosphorylation remains an area of intense research interest. Advances in multiplexed quantitation utilizing isobaric tags (e.g., TMT and iTRAQ) have the potential to create a new paradigm in quantitative proteomics. New instrumentation and software are propelling these multiplexed workflows forward, which results in more accurate, sensitive, and reproducible quantitation across tens of thousands of phosphopeptides. This study assesses the performance of multiplexed quantitative phosphoproteomics on the Orbitrap Fusion mass spectrometer. Utilizing a two-phosphoproteome model of precursor ion interference, we assessed the accuracy of phosphopeptide quantitation across a variety of experimental approaches. These methods included the use of synchronous precursor selection (SPS) to enhance TMT reporter ion intensity and accuracy. We found that (i) ratio distortion remained a problem for phosphopeptide analysis in multiplexed quantitative workflows, (ii) ratio distortion can be overcome by the use of an SPS-MS3 scan, (iii) interfering ions generally possessed a different charge state than the target precursor, and (iv) selecting only the phosphate neutral loss peak (single notch) for the MS3 scan still provided accurate ratio measurements. Remarkably, these data suggest that the underlying cause of interference may not be due to coeluting and cofragmented peptides but instead from consistent, low level background fragmentation. Finally, as a proof-of-concept 10-plex experiment, we compared phosphopeptide levels from five murine brains to five livers. In total, the SPS-MS3 method quantified 38 247 phosphopeptides, corresponding to 11 000 phosphorylation sites. With 10 measurements recorded for each phosphopeptide, this equates to more than 628 000 binary comparisons collected in less than 48 h.

Indexed as

Brain ChemistryAnimalsChromatography, High Pressure LiquidChromatography, Reverse-PhaseLiverMaleMass SpectrometryMicePhosphopeptidesPhosphorylationProteomicsPhosphopeptides

Identifiers

PMID25521595
PMCPMC4303329
OpenAlexW2014925652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.