Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25521372›Full record

ArticleNeuron2014

Looks can be deceiving: reconsidering the evidence for gliotransmission.

Steven A Sloan, Ben A Barres

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Neuron, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Calcium signaling in astrocytes and gliotransmitter release.Frontiers in synaptic neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Neuron-Glia Interactions and Brain Circuits.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Exocytosis in Astrocytes.Biomolecules · 2021
    Review
  14. Glia as sculptors of synaptic plasticity.Neuroscience research · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Steven A SloanDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-5125, USA. Electronic address: ssloan1@stanford.edu.
Ben A BarresDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305-5125, USA.
Stanford University · US

Funding

An Astrocytic Basis for HumanityR01NS081703 · NINDS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BARRES, BEN A · 2012 to 2016
$1.9M
Do Astrocytes Cause Neurodevelopmental Disorders?F30MH106261 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SLOAN, STEVEN A · 2014 to 2016
$94k
NIMH NIH HHS F30 MH106261NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS081703
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gliotransmission, a process involving active vesicular release of glutamate and other neurotransmitters by astrocytes, is thought to play a critical role in many brain functions. A new paper by Nedergaard et al. (2014) identifies an experimental flaw in these previous studies suggesting that astrocytes may not perform active vesicular release after all.

Indexed as

Gene Expression RegulationAnimalsFemaleMaleNeuronsSNARE ProteinsSNARE Proteins

Identifiers

PMID25521372
PMCPMC4433290
OpenAlexW2079635232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.