Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25521247›Full record

ArticleeLife2014

Mechanical design principles of a mitotic spindle.

Jonathan J Ward, Hélio Roque, Claude Antony, François Nédélec

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Distinct regions of the kinesin-5 C-terminal tail are essential for mitotic spindle midzone localization and sliding force.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Anaphase B: Long-standing models meet new concepts.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jonathan J WardCell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.
Hélio RoqueCell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.
Claude AntonyCell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.
François NédélecCell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An organised spindle is crucial to the fidelity of chromosome segregation, but the relationship between spindle structure and function is not well understood in any cell type. The anaphase B spindle in fission yeast has a slender morphology and must elongate against compressive forces. This 'pushing' mode of chromosome transport renders the spindle susceptible to breakage, as observed in cells with a variety of defects. Here we perform electron tomographic analyses of the spindle, which suggest that it organises a limited supply of structural components to increase its compressive strength. Structural integrity is maintained throughout the spindle's fourfold elongation by organising microtubules into a rigid transverse array, preserving correct microtubule number and dynamically rescaling microtubule length.

Indexed as

AnaphaseBiological TransportCell CycleChromosome SegregationCompressive StrengthElectron Microscope TomographyMicrotubulesSchizosaccharomycesSpindle ApparatusTime-Lapse Imagingbiophysicscell biologycytoskeletonforcesmitosisS. cerevisiaeS. pombestructural biology

Identifiers

PMID25521247
PMCPMC4290452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.