Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25520712›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2014

Molecular tools for differentiation of non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae from Haemophilus haemolyticus.

Janessa Pickering, Peter C Richmond, Lea-Ann S Kirkham

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Oropharyngeal Carriage ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  8. Nasal Delivery of a CommensalInfection and immunity · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Janessa PickeringSchool of Paediatrics and Child Health, The University of Western Australia Perth, WA, Australia.
Peter C RichmondSchool of Paediatrics and Child Health, The University of Western Australia Perth, WA, Australia ; Centre for Vaccine and Infectious Disease Research, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia Perth, WA, Australia.
Lea-Ann S KirkhamSchool of Paediatrics and Child Health, The University of Western Australia Perth, WA, Australia ; Centre for Vaccine and Infectious Disease Research, Telethon Kids Institute, The University of Western Australia Perth, WA, Australia.
University of Western Australia · AUThe Kids Research Institute Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-typeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi) and Haemophilus haemolyticus are closely related bacteria that reside in the upper respiratory tract. NTHi is associated with respiratory tract infections that frequently result in antibiotic prescription whilst H. haemolyticus is rarely associated with disease. NTHi and H. haemolyticus can be indistinguishable by traditional culture methods and molecular differentiation has proven difficult. This current review chronologically summarizes the molecular approaches that have been developed for differentiation of NTHi from H. haemolyticus, highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of each target and/or technique. We also provide suggestions for the development of new tools that would be suitable for clinical and research laboratories.

Indexed as

cultureHaemophilus haemolyticusidentificationmolecular differentiationNTHi

Identifiers

PMID25520712
PMCPMC4251515
OpenAlexW2070234983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.