Evidence map›Paper›PMID 25520696›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology2014

Cerebral microdialysis for protein biomarker monitoring in the neurointensive care setting - a technical approach.

Lars Hillered, Andreas P Dahlin, Fredrik Clausen, Jiangtao Chu, Jonas Bergquist, Klas Hjort, Per Enblad, Anders Lewén

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lars HilleredDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Neuroscience, Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden.
Andreas P DahlinDivision of Microsystems Technology, Department of Engineering Sciences, Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden.
Fredrik ClausenDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Neuroscience, Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden.
Jiangtao ChuDivision of Microsystems Technology, Department of Engineering Sciences, Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden.
Jonas BergquistAnalytical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry-BMC and SciLifeLab, Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden.
Klas HjortDivision of Microsystems Technology, Department of Engineering Sciences, Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden.
Per EnbladDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Neuroscience, Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden.
Anders LewénDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Neuroscience, Uppsala University , Uppsala , Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebral microdialysis (MD) was introduced as a neurochemical monitoring method in the early 1990s and is currently widely used for the sampling of low molecular weight molecules, signaling energy crisis, and cellular distress in the neurointensive care (NIC) setting. There is a growing interest in MD for harvesting of intracerebral protein biomarkers of secondary injury mechanisms in acute traumatic and neurovascular brain injury in the NIC community. The initial enthusiasm over the opportunity to sample protein biomarkers with high molecular weight cut-off MD catheters has dampened somewhat with the emerging realization of inherent methodological problems including protein-protein interaction, protein adhesion, and biofouling, causing an unstable in vivo performance (i.e., fluid recovery and extraction efficiency) of the MD catheter. This review will focus on the results of a multidisciplinary collaborative effort, within the Uppsala Berzelii Centre for Neurodiagnostics during the past several years, to study the features of the complex process of high molecular weight cut-off MD for protein biomarkers. This research has led to new methodology showing robust in vivo performance with optimized fluid recovery and improved extraction efficiency, allowing for more accurate biomarker monitoring. In combination with evolving analytical methodology allowing for multiplex biomarker analysis in ultra-small MD samples, a new opportunity opens up for high-resolution temporal mapping of secondary injury cascades, such as neuroinflammation and other cell injury reactions directly in the injured human brain. Such data may provide an important basis for improved characterization of complex injuries, e.g., traumatic and neurovascular brain injury, and help in defining targets and treatment windows for neuroprotective drug development.

Indexed as

acute brain injurybiofoulingcatheter performanceinflammationintracranial pressuremicrodialysisneurointensive careprotein biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID25520696
PMCPMC4253950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.